Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link:
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Popular Search: articles on VAT and GST in India :: empanelment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: VAT RATES :: TDS :: form 3cd :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: due date for vat payment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: cpt :: VAT Audit
From the Courts »
 Virag Tiwari Vs. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-21 & Others
  Anand Agarwal vs. Vilas Chandrakant Gaokar (Bombay High Court)
 Maxopp Investment Ltd vs. CIT (Supreme Court)
 Order of a Four-Member Appellate Authority constituted under Chartered Accountants Act is Valid: Delhi HC
 Emami Infrastructure Ltd vs. ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
  Anand Agarwal vs. Vilas Chandrakant Gaokar (Bombay High Court)
 Bar Council of India vs. A. K. Balaji & Ors (Supreme Court)
 ITO vs. Venkatesh Premises Co-op Society Ltd (Supreme Court)
 Pr CIT vs. Amphenol Interconnect India P. Ltd (Bombay High Court)
 Pr CIT vs. Amphenol Interconnect India P. Ltd (Bombay High Court)
 Anand Agarwal vs. Vilas Chandrakant Gaokar (Bombay High Court)

Priya Padwal Foundation, Plot No.665, 19th Road, TPS-III, Dr.Ambedkar Road, Khar-West, Mumbai-400052. Vs. Director of Income Tax (Exemption n), Mumbai.
June, 26th 2015
                   ,   "" 

       .. ,        ,                                  

                   ./I.T.A. No.4701/Mum/2013
             (   / Assessment Year : Not Applicable)

 Priya Padwal Foundation,           / Director of Income Tax
 Plot No.665, 19th Road, TPS-III,   Vs. (Exemption n),
 Dr.Ambedkar Road,                      Mumbai.
        ( /Appellant)               ..    (    / Respondent)

          . /   . /PAN/GIR No. :AACTP1704A

            / Appellant by               None
              /Rspondent by              Shri B Jaykumar

            / Date of Hearing                 :   24.6.2015
            /Date of Pronouncement : 24.6.2015

                                 / O R D E R


       The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated
26.4.2013 passed by Director of Income Tax (Exemption), Mumbai
rejecting the application filed by the assessee seeking Registration u/s 12A
of the Income Tax Act, 1961(the Act).

2.     None appeared on behalf of the assessee though the notices were
sent by Registered Post on earlier occasion. Though the notice sent by
registered post sent on 27.10.2014 was returned back un-served, yet the
subsequent notice sent by the Registered post has not been returned
                                     2                  I T A N o . 4 7 0 1 / Mu m / 2 0 1 3

back. Hence, we proceed to dispose of the appeal ex-parte, without the
presence of assessee.

3.    We heard the ld. DR and perused the record. We notice that the
Director of Income Tax (E) has vehemently rejected the application of the
assessee that the Trust Deed does not contain proper Dissolution Clause.
From the perusal of the order passed by the DIT(E), we notice that the ld.
DIT (E) has not offered adequate opportunity to the assessee to explain
the same and/or to amend the Trust Deed. Under these set of facts, we
are of the view that this issue needs to be examined afresh by providing
proper opportunity of being heard to the assessee. Accordingly, we set
aside the order of DIT(E) and restore the same to his file with a direction
to examine the application of the assessee afresh by affording necessary
opportunity of being heard to the assessee.

4.    In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for
statistical purposes.

            Pronounced in the open court on 24th June, 2015
                  24th June, 2015    

  Sd                                      sd
(    / AMIT SHUKLA)                   (..  / B.R. BASKARAN)

 Mumbai: 24th June,2015.

. ../ SRL , Sr. PS

        /Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1.  / The Appellant
2.      / The Respondent.
3.     () / The CIT(A)- concerned
                          3           I T A N o . 4 7 0 1 / Mu m / 2 0 1 3

4.      / CIT concerned
5.      ,     ,  /
     DR, ITAT, Mumbai concerned
6.     / Guard file.
                                         / BY ORDER,
True copy
                                     (Asstt. Registrar)
                                  ,   /ITAT, Mumbai
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Software Work Flow Workflow Software Software Automation Workflow automation Software Design Workflow Design Business Work Flow Workflow automation tools

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions