Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Income Tax Addition Made Towards Unsubstantiated Share Capital Is Eligible For Section 80-IC Deduction: Delhi High Court

PBJ Industrial Electronics Pvt.Ltd., 72, BCD, Kandivali Govt Ind. Estate, Kandivali Charkop, Kandivali(E), Mumbai-400067 Vs. Income Tax Officer-9(2)(4), Mumbai-400020
June, 26th 2015
                 ,   "" 
   IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL "C" BENCH, MUMBAI

    BEFORE S/SHRI B.R.BASKARAN (AM) AND AMIT SHUKLA, (JM)
      .. ,        ,                                  

                   ./I.T.A. No.316/Mum/2013
                (   / Assessment Year : 2009-10)

 PBJ Industrial Electronics        / Income Tax Officer-9(2)(4),
 Pvt.Ltd.,                         Vs. Mumbai-400020
 72, BCD, Kandivali Govt Ind.
 Estate,
 Kandivali Charkop,
  Kandivali(E), Mumbai-400067
        ( /Appellant)              ..    (    / Respondent)


         . /   . /PAN/GIR No. :AAACP2508H

            / Appellant by              None
               /Rspondent by            Shri Premanand J


            / Date of Hearing                :   24.6.2015
            /Date of Pronouncement : 24.6.2015


                                  / O R D E R


PER B.R. BASKARAN (AM)


      The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated
16.10.2012 passed by Ld CIT(A)-20, Mumbai for assessment year 2009-10
on the following issues:-
(a) Disallowance of Commission paid to Wave form controls P Ltd. (b) Disallowance of Research and Development Expenses (c) Disallowance of other expenses. 2 I T A N o . 3 1 6 / Mu m / 2 0 1 3 2. Though the notice of hearing was sent to the assessee by Registered post on the earlier occasion, none appeared on behalf of the assessee and hence we proceed to dispose of the appeal ex-parte, without the presence of the assessee. 3. We heard Ld D.R and perused the record. We have gone through the order passed by Ld CIT(A) on the above said issues. We notice that the assessee did not file any document before us to contradict the findings given by the first appellate authority. Under these set of facts, we do not find any infirmity in the order passed by Ld CIT(A) on all the issues referred above. Accordingly, we confirm his order. 4. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed. Pronounced accordingly on 24th June, 2015. 24th June, 2015 Sd sd ( / AMIT SHUKLA) (.. / B.R. BASKARAN) / JUDICIAL MEMBER / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Mumbai: 24 th June,2015. . ../ SRL , Sr. PS /Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. / The Appellant 2. / The Respondent. 3. () / The CIT(A)- concerned 4. / CIT concerned 5. , , / DR, ITAT, Mumbai concerned 6. / Guard file. / BY ORDER, True copy (Asstt. Registrar) , /ITAT, Mumbai
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting