Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
Popular Search: empanelment :: form 3cd :: VAT RATES :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: VAT Audit :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: due date for vat payment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: TDS :: cpt :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4%
« From the Courts »
 Group M. Media India Pvt. Ltd vs. UOI (Bombay High Court)
 Shreemati Devi vs. CIT (Allahabad High Court)
 Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
  Dr. Gautam Sen vs. CCIT (Bombay High Court)
 Dr. Gautam Sen vs. CCIT (Bombay High Court)
 DCIT vs. Shivshankar R. Sharma (ITAT Mumbai)
 ACIT vs. Jawaharlal Agicha (ITAT Mumbai)
 CIT vs. M/s. D. Chetan & Co (Bombay High Court)
 Makes further amendments to Notification no. 157/90-Customs dated 28th March, 1990 regarding temporary admission under the ATA Carnet
 Appointment of Common Adjudicating Authority by DGRI - 2/2016-Customs
 ransfers Of Hon’ble Members Of The ITAT (September 2016)

M/s Chandulal Mehta and Co., Pvt. Ltd., 9/15/MAMA Paramanand Marg, Gardi Mansion, Opera House, Mumbai-400004 Vs. Income Tax Officer-5(1)(3), Mumbai.
June, 26th 2015
                 ,   "" 

      .. ,        ,                                  

                    ./I.T.A. No.302/Mum/2013
                 (   / Assessment Year :2009-10)

 M/s Chandulal Mehta and Co.,     / Income Tax Officer-5(1)(3),
 Pvt. Ltd.,                       Vs. Mumbai.
 9/15/MAMA Paramanand Marg,
 Gardi Mansion, Opera House,
        ( /Appellant)              ..     (    / Respondent)

         . /   . /PAN/GIR No. :AAACC1520C

               / Appellant by            None
                /Rspondent by            Shri Premanand J

            / Date of Hearing                 :   25.6.2015
            /Date of Pronouncement : 25.6.2015

                                / O R D E R


      The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order     dated
6.11.2012 passed by Ld CIT(A)-9, Mumbai for assessment year 2009-10
on the following issues:-
      (a)     Addition of Rs.38.50 lakhs made u/s 68 of the Act.
      (b)     Addition made out of business promotion and entertainment
      (c)     Addition made out of electricity charges;
      (d)     Addition made out of repairs and maintenance expenses;
      (e)     Addition made out of interest expenses;
      (f)     Addition made out of other expenses; and
                                     2                   I T A N o . 3 0 2 / Mu m / 2 0 1 3

      (g)   Interest charged u/s 234B of the Act.

2.      Though the appeal was filed way back in January, 2013, none
appeared on behalf of the assessee on two occasions namely on 14.7.2014
and 21.1.2015. Hence, notice was sent to the assessee by Registered
post AD. Subsequently, when the hearing was posted on 22.4.2015, the
assessee filed a letter dated 21.4.2015 seeking adjournment. Accordingly,
the case was posted for hearing today. However, none appeared on behalf
of the assessee and hence we proceed to dispose of the appeal ex-parte,
without the presence of the assessee.

3.    We heard Ld D.R and perused the record. We have gone through
the order passed by Ld.CIT(A) on the above said issues. We notice that
the assessee did not file any document before us to contradict the findings
given by the first appellate authority. Under these set of facts, we do not
find any infirmity in the order passed by Ld CIT(A) on all the issues
referred above. Accordingly, we confirm his order.

4.   In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed.
            Pronounced accordingly on 25th June, 2015.
                                          25th June, 2015    

  Sd                                      sd
(    / AMIT SHUKLA)                   (..  / B.R. BASKARAN)

 Mumbai: 25th June,2015.

. ../ SRL , Sr. PS
                            3               I T A N o . 3 0 2 / Mu m / 2 0 1 3

        /Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1.  / The Appellant
2.      / The Respondent.
3.     () / The CIT(A)- concerned
4.      / CIT concerned
5.      ,     ,  /
     DR, ITAT, Mumbai concerned
6.     / Guard file.

                                             / BY ORDER,
True copy
                                       (Asstt. Registrar)
                                    ,  /ITAT, Mumbai
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Software Outsourcing Company Offshore Software Outsourcing Software Outsourcing Company India Offshore Outsourcing Company India Software BPO Software Business Process Outsourcing Software Outsourcing India Offsho

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions