Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Karnataka High Court restrains Bengaluru-based Institute of Chartered Tax Practitioners India from enrolling candidates for its courses
 Attachment on Cash Credit of Assessee under GST Act: Delhi HC directs Bank to Comply Instructions to Vacate
 Income Tax Addition Made Towards Unsubstantiated Share Capital Is Eligible For Section 80-IC Deduction: Delhi High Court
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court
 Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger
 Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court

ITAT appeal delays cost I-T dept big bucks
July, 11th 2009

The I-T department has lost the opportunity to recover revenues running into thousands of crores after failing to file its appeals before the Bombay High Court within the stipulated period of 120 days. The Bombay High Court has dismissed about 400 appeals recently.

Section 260 A of the Income-Tax Act stipulates that an appeal against the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) order be filed before the high court within 120 days of receiving the ITAT order. The high court, however, liberally allowed condonation of delays until a Supreme Court order in March this year.

The division bench of justice VC Daga and justice JP Devadhar observed that there was no provision in the I-T Act for the condonation of delay (allowing the appeals to be filed despite a lapse in the stipulated period). As such, the high court does not have the jurisdiction to allow the appeals filed by the I-T department after the lapse of the given period.

The high court order is in line with a Supreme Court judgement, which pertains to a case between Hongo India and the Commissioner of Customs and Excise. The dismissal order that was passed in the appeal in the Bombay High Court was filed by the Commissioner of I-T against Grasim Industries. The other appeals that were dismissed subsequently were also on the same grounds.

The Supreme Court judgement, delivered by a bench of three judges, was cited by the Grasim Industries counsel, while opposing the condonation of delay. Meanwhile, advocate JS Saluja, appearing for the I-T department, contended that as per the provisions of the Limitation Act, the high court has the power to condone delay in matters where the stipulated period has lapsed.

An official of the rank of chief commissioner, I-T told ET: We would not be able to comment on the developments in the high court until we receive the orders and study it. The high court is the third appellate authority on tax matters after the commissioner, I-T appeal and ITAT. Since the ITAT is the last fact finding authority on income-tax matters, the high courts jurisdiction is confined to questions of law involved in tax cases.

A source in the I-T department said filing appeals is a process that involves several departments such as the office of commissioner (I-T), assessing officer and standing committee and the counsel representing the department. The procedure of filing appeals was earlier managed by the officers of ministry of law and justice up to 2006.

Later it changed hands to the I-T department. However, a senior officer of the department said: Most of the appeals dismissed today are not serious appeals. In most cases, even if the chances of winning the appeals are minimal, the officer decides to file the appeal to be on the safer side. However, there can be still serious cases with a fair chance of winning.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2025 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting