Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: due date for vat payment :: cpt :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: VAT Audit :: TDS :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: form 3cd :: empanelment :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: VAT RATES :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
 
 
From the Courts »
 The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 Vs. Inter Globe Technology Quotient Pvt. Ltd.
 Akum Drugs And Pharmaceuticals Limited Through: Director Shri. Sanjeev Jain Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(1) & Anr.
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-2 New Delhi Vs. Meeta Gutgutia Prop. M/s Ferns „n? Petals
 Prabhatam Investment Pvt. Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
 CIT vs. Laxman Industrial Resources Pvt.Ltd (Delhi High Court)
  State Of Jharkhand vs. Lalu Prasad Yadav (Supreme Court)
 CIT vs. Krishan K. Aggarwal (Supreme Court)
 Ambuja Cements Ltd. Vs. Commissioner, Service Tax Commissionerate, Delhi
 Director Of Income Tax (Exemptions) Vs. Vishwa Hindu Parishad
 ITAT Proposes Important Changes To Tribunal Rules
 Meherjee Cassinath Holdings Pvt. Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)

Base transfer pricing on pre-depreciation profits: ITAT
July, 10th 2009

Transfer pricing analysis should be based on pre-depreciation profits in the case where the company can demonstrate that higher depreciation has affected its profitability, according to an order passed by the Delhi Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT).

The tribunal, which pronounced the order in a case filed by Delhi-based Schefenacker Motherson, a JV between Motherson Sumi Systems India and Germany-based Schefenacker International, sent the adjustment back to the transfer pricing officer for re-examination.

The ITAT held that such an approach would help avoid complications arising from huge variations in depreciation claims. This has come as a relief to companies when depreciation is high due to relatively new machines, high-end technology use and capacities are grossly underutilised.

ITAT president Vimal Gandhi, who is an expert in cross-border taxation and is also involved with the United Nations transfer pricing programmes, said that transfer pricing analysis needs comparisons of profit of two or more similarly positioned companies to ensure that the profit figure is not manipulated by the taxpayer company.
Hence, a proper comparison of profits of companies in the same industry would be difficult, if depreciation is included in the calculation of profits as depreciation varies from company to company.

Depreciation would be higher in the companies that use state-of-art technology, while it is less in units that operate older machines. Hence, an ideal solution to this problem is to analyse the profitability of companies on the basis of cash profit on sales, the tribunal observed. Profits of units are compared in transfer pricing analyses to ascertain the profits are in accordance with industry norms and are not manipulated through internal transactions at artificial prices.

TPOs routinely find variations in depreciation to reject the claim of lower profits. In the case of Schenfenacker Mothersons, the I-T department argued that the depreciation is an element of cost that cannot be ignored and, since financial impact of variations cannot be quantified, no adjustments can be made.

The ITAT did not agree with the I-T departments contention. The tribunal ruled that computation of profits depends on the context and for that purpose depreciation is to be computed. It stated that there is no formula that apply universally. The ITAT pointed out that the contention that depreciation levels have vitiated the comparison, remains uncontested by the I-T department.

OECD guidelines and norms of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India are for exclusion of such depreciation, the tribunal said, before concluding that depreciation should be excluded in the present case to make any comparison meaningful.

Based on this analysis, the transfer pricing adjustment of Rs 1.97 crore was sent back to the TPO for re-examination.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Content Management System development CMS development Content Management Solutions CMS Solutions Content Management Services CMS Services CMS Software

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions