« Top Headlines » Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs  Mock Test Papers Series - I & II for Students appearing in CA Foundation January 2027 Examination.  Income Tax Rules 2026: CBDT Introduces Revised Form 161 for Penalty Waiver, Clarifies Misreporting Categories and Taxpayer Relief  ITR Filing and Income Tax Audit Deadline Extended: 5 Critical Things Taxpayers Must Know  Filing Belated ITR for AY 2026-27? Know Which Losses You Can Carry Forward and Which You May Lose  CBDT Extends Tax Audit Report Deadline to October 21, ITR Filing Last Date to November 21 for AY 2026-27  CBDT Extends AY 2026-27 ITR Filing Deadline for Tax-Audit Cases: New Dates and Key Compliance Details  Foreign Assets Missing From Your ITR? Income Tax Department Opens One-Time Disclosure Window  Tax Audit Deadline September 30: Why AIS, TDS and GST Figures May Not Match Your ITR and What Taxpayers Should Do  Tax audit deadline September 30: Common mistakes taxpayers should avoid  Your ITR says ‘verified’, but the refund hasn’t arrived? 5 reasons why your money could be stuck  Missed the ITR Deadline but TDS Refund Is Due? Here’s How You Can Still Claim Your Money «  E-tax payment may be compulsory... Lower corporate tax... » Stockbrokers under lens for evading service tax January, 04th 2008 Stockbroking firms involved in marketing of IPOs have attracted the ire of service tax department for not paying tax on the activity. These firms may be issued show cause notices. After an extensive audit, the department has found most firms were not paying service tax for IPO-related marketing activities even as they received fat commissions for the same. Stockbroking is a taxable service attracting 12% tax on all related transactions. Service tax is collected from the clients of stock brokers. However, marketing of IPOs does not get covered under the stock broking service as it is essentially a business auxiliary service. Stock broking firms charge 0.1-0.25% as commission for marketing IPOs from the registrars to any issue. The charges are higher in the high networth individual segment. Sources said most stock broking firms were not charging service tax on the service fee received from registrars. In service tax regime, the liability to collect the service tax lies with the provider, who has to collect it from the consumer and deposit it with the government. A large number of companies tapped the capital market last year. The number of IPOs in 2007 stood at 107 against 92 in 2006. The total amount raised through the issues was Rs 45,137 crore, compared to Rs 24,679 crore in 2006. There have also been instances of non-payment in the broking segment, especially in the futures and options segment. Brokers were found to be conducting trading in derivatives on behalf of clients in their own trading account to avoid service tax. The service tax department has upped its ante on the stock broking service, which despite booming markets did not show very encouraging growth. In the first half of the current fiscal, the stock broking service grew just 18% to Rs 523.82 crore. Interestingly, securities transaction tax reflected the buoyancy in markets and grew by over 74% in the first nine months of the fiscal.