Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: VAT Audit :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: due date for vat payment :: TDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: empanelment :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: form 3cd :: VAT RATES :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: cpt :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4%
 
 
News Headlines »
 Directions under section 119 of the Income-tax Act, 1961
 Securities excluded from GST ambit in revised Bill
 GST dilemma: Hope fades for new tax regime
 5nance.com launches tax investment platform
 Is government tapping your phone?
 Income tax department to use analytics to look for discrepancies in bank accounts
 GST Council fails to break deadlock over indirect tax regime, next meet on Dec 11 and 12 to hammer out differences
 Invoking Writ Jurisdiction For Income Tax Matters
 How to file income-tax returns online
 How Income Tax Returns Are Scrutinised
 All About New Income Disclosure Scheme to make Demonetisation successful

How to end tax uncertainty
September, 07th 2015

Certainty of tax is so serious an issue that it attracted editorial attention recently in Business Standard. It was in the context of direct tax. I am writing this piece from the indirect tax side. Here, I am referring not only to the legal aspect but also to interpretational and administrative aspects.

Legal issue
Pushing people to litigation and not giving an opportunity to them to ask for ruling from the Authority for Advance Rulings (AAR) is currently a major source of tax uncertainty. In the mid 1990s, a small industrial manufacturer approached me and wanted a ruling that his product was not a 'gold-manufacture' as he used a miniscule amount of gold. He said that he would stop manufacture if it was ruled as 'gold-manufacture' since without a ruling, audit may take an adverse view some day.

When the AAR was born in 1999, it was a blue baby, a powerless creature, which could give ruling only for proposed activities. There is scope to enlarge it to cover an activity, which has started, while there may be doubt about the classification. If no show-cause memo has been issued, it is possible to make provision for asking for ruling. For this purpose, the definition of advance ruling in Section 28E (b) will have to be amended suitably.

Uncertainty due to Board not issuing ruling
Uncertainties are created by interpretational disparity arising out of too many rates of duty and exemptions. In Customs alone, there are 23 rates of duty. In Excise though the rates are few, exemptions, Lists and conditions are in thousands. So there are many controversies regarding classification and Cenvat credit. Central Board of Excise and Customs rulings would have helped but it does not give rulings for such controversial issues on the basis of a specious logic that the issues are sub-judice though hundreds of rulings have been given in the past on sub-judice issues. Unfortunately, now the inaction in this field has become glaring.

I have checked all circulars and taken only those issued on classification. Section 37B and 151A have become dead letters. Data in the table prove that the Board has practically abdicated its responsibility to give rulings on classification. This is where my suggestion begins. The finance minister should ask the Board why it does not do its statutory duty.

How to end tax uncertaintyAdministrative-Moving High Court
Even when the legal position is clear that in classification matters if the Department is not satisfied with the ruling of the Tribunal, the remedy lies in filing an appeal in the Supreme Court and not High Court. There are many court judgments to that effect - the commissioners are merrily going to High Court and getting a snubbing there. They do not care about the legal position or judgements of the superior courts. They care only for Board's circular. So, the Board must clarify the obvious in a circular .

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Customer relationship management software CRM software Operational CRM Collaborative CRM

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions