Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: due date for vat payment :: cpt :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: form 3cd :: VAT Audit :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: TDS :: VAT RATES :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: empanelment
 
 
From the Courts »
 The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-4 Vs. Inter Globe Technology Quotient Pvt. Ltd.
 Akum Drugs And Pharmaceuticals Limited Through: Director Shri. Sanjeev Jain Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(1) & Anr.
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-2 New Delhi Vs. Meeta Gutgutia Prop. M/s Ferns „n? Petals
 Prabhatam Investment Pvt. Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
 CIT vs. Laxman Industrial Resources Pvt.Ltd (Delhi High Court)
  State Of Jharkhand vs. Lalu Prasad Yadav (Supreme Court)
 CIT vs. Krishan K. Aggarwal (Supreme Court)
 Ambuja Cements Ltd. Vs. Commissioner, Service Tax Commissionerate, Delhi
 Director Of Income Tax (Exemptions) Vs. Vishwa Hindu Parishad
 ITAT Proposes Important Changes To Tribunal Rules
 Meherjee Cassinath Holdings Pvt. Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)

Mr Kamaluddin E Vastani,C/O. M/s. Intex,54/56, Champshi Bhimji Road,2nd floor, Mazgaon, Mumbai-400 010 VS. I.T.O 17(1)(2), Mumbai
September, 03rd 2012
                      IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,
                              MUMBAI BENCH `A' BENCH

               BEFORE SHRI B.R.MITTAL(JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND
                SHRI B.RAMAKOTAIAH (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER)

                                ITA No.1098/Mum/2009
                               Assessment Year: 2004-05

Mr Kamaluddin E Vastani,                     I.T.O 17(1)(2),
C/O. M/s. Intex,                             Mumbai
54/56, Champshi Bhimji Road,
2nd floor, Mazgaon,                    Vs.
Mumbai-400 010
PA No.AAAPV 9503 F

(Appellant)                                  (Respondent)


                             Appellant by : None
                             Respondent by: Shri T.D.Singh

Date of hearing:               22.8.2012
Date of pronouncement:          31.8.2012




                                     ORDER

Per B.R.Mittal, JM:

       The assessee has filed this appeal for assessment year 2004-05 against order
dated 10.11.2008 of ld CIT(A)-XVII, Mumbai.


2.     Earlier the appeal was fixed on 15.5.2012 and the same was adjourned to
22.8.2012 in the presence of representatives of parties.


3.     On the date fixed for hearing i.e. on 22.8.2012, none appeared on behalf of
assessee. Nor there is any application for adjournment. It appears that the assessee is
not interested in prosecuting his appeal before the Tribunal. In this regard, we are
supported by the decision of Hon'ble Calcutta High Court in the case of CIT vs.
B.N.Bhattarchargee and another, 118 ITR 460, wherein, Their Lordships have held that
"the appeal does not mean merely filing of the appeal but effectively pursuing it" . We
                                            2                           ITA No.1098/Mum/2009
                                                                      Assessment Year: 2004-05


are also supported by the decision of ITAT Delhi in the case of CIT vs. Multiplan India
(P)Ltd., 38 ITD 320(Del).


4.     In view of above and also considering the provisions of Rule 19 of the Appellate
Tribunal Rules, 1963, appeal of the assessee is liable to be dismissed.





5.     In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed for non-prosecution.


       Pronounced in the open court on     31st August, 2012




                  Sd/-                                            Sd/-
           (B.RAMAKOTAIAH)                                   (B.R. MITTAL)
           Accountant Member                                Judicial Member

Mumbai, Dated      31stAugust, 2012
Parida

Copy to:
1. The appellant
2. The respondent
3. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals),XVII, Mumbai
4. Commissioner of Income Tax, 17 , Mumbai
5. Departmental Representative, Bench `A' Mumbai

//TRUE COPY//                                               BY ORDER


                                             ASSTT. REGISTRAR, ITAT, MUMBAI
 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Multimedia Presentations Multimedia Solutions 3D Solutions Corporate Presentations Business Presentations Multimedia Presentation India M

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions