Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: form 3cd :: due date for vat payment :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: VAT Audit :: TDS :: cpt :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: empanelment :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: VAT RATES :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes
 
 
From the Courts »
 Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-1 Vs. Amadeus India Pvt. Ltd.
  AAA Paper Marketing Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Lucknow)
 CIT vs. Mettler Toledo India Pvt. Ltd (Bombay High Court)
 B.A.Mohota Textiles Traders Pvt. Ltd vs. DCIT (Bombay High Court)
 Shrey Infradevelopers Pvt Ltd Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central-2 New Delhi Vs. Meeta Gutgutia Prop. M/s Ferns „N'? Petals
 Shrey Infradevelopers Pvt. Ltd Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax
 South Asian Enterprises Ltd. & Anr. Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr
 Crescent Construction Co vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
 AAA Paper Marketing Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Lucknow)
 Pioneer Overseas Corporation Usa (India Branch) Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax (International Taxation)- 2 Delhi

Mr Kamaluddin E Vastani,C/O. M/s. Intex,54/56, Champshi Bhimji Road,2nd floor, Mazgaon, Mumbai-400 010 VS. I.T.O 17(1)(2), Mumbai
September, 03rd 2012
                      IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,
                              MUMBAI BENCH `A' BENCH

               BEFORE SHRI B.R.MITTAL(JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND
                SHRI B.RAMAKOTAIAH (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER)

                                ITA No.1098/Mum/2009
                               Assessment Year: 2004-05

Mr Kamaluddin E Vastani,                     I.T.O 17(1)(2),
C/O. M/s. Intex,                             Mumbai
54/56, Champshi Bhimji Road,
2nd floor, Mazgaon,                    Vs.
Mumbai-400 010
PA No.AAAPV 9503 F

(Appellant)                                  (Respondent)


                             Appellant by : None
                             Respondent by: Shri T.D.Singh

Date of hearing:               22.8.2012
Date of pronouncement:          31.8.2012




                                     ORDER

Per B.R.Mittal, JM:

       The assessee has filed this appeal for assessment year 2004-05 against order
dated 10.11.2008 of ld CIT(A)-XVII, Mumbai.


2.     Earlier the appeal was fixed on 15.5.2012 and the same was adjourned to
22.8.2012 in the presence of representatives of parties.


3.     On the date fixed for hearing i.e. on 22.8.2012, none appeared on behalf of
assessee. Nor there is any application for adjournment. It appears that the assessee is
not interested in prosecuting his appeal before the Tribunal. In this regard, we are
supported by the decision of Hon'ble Calcutta High Court in the case of CIT vs.
B.N.Bhattarchargee and another, 118 ITR 460, wherein, Their Lordships have held that
"the appeal does not mean merely filing of the appeal but effectively pursuing it" . We
                                            2                           ITA No.1098/Mum/2009
                                                                      Assessment Year: 2004-05


are also supported by the decision of ITAT Delhi in the case of CIT vs. Multiplan India
(P)Ltd., 38 ITD 320(Del).


4.     In view of above and also considering the provisions of Rule 19 of the Appellate
Tribunal Rules, 1963, appeal of the assessee is liable to be dismissed.





5.     In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed for non-prosecution.


       Pronounced in the open court on     31st August, 2012




                  Sd/-                                            Sd/-
           (B.RAMAKOTAIAH)                                   (B.R. MITTAL)
           Accountant Member                                Judicial Member

Mumbai, Dated      31stAugust, 2012
Parida

Copy to:
1. The appellant
2. The respondent
3. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals),XVII, Mumbai
4. Commissioner of Income Tax, 17 , Mumbai
5. Departmental Representative, Bench `A' Mumbai

//TRUE COPY//                                               BY ORDER


                                             ASSTT. REGISTRAR, ITAT, MUMBAI
 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Multimedia Presentations Multimedia Solutions 3D Solutions Corporate Presentations Business Presentations Multimedia Presentation India M

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions