Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link:
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Popular Search: due date for vat payment :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: VAT RATES :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: cpt :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: TDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: form 3cd :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: empanelment :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: VAT Audit
From the Courts »
 Shri Rakesh Kumar Gupta Vs. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Xiii & Anr.
 Central Board Of Direct Taxes Vs. Satya Narain Shukla
 Meena Rastogi Vs. Central Board Of Direct Taxes, & Anr.
 Siddharth Rastogi Vs. Central Board Of Direct Taxes, Union Of India, Ministry Of Finance, Department Of Revenue & Anr.
 ITO vs. NVS Builders Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Delhi)
 Approva Systems Pvt. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Pune)
 Procter & Gamble Home Products Pvt. Ltd vs. ITAT (Bombay High Court)
 Virag Tiwari Vs. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-21 & Others
  Anand Agarwal vs. Vilas Chandrakant Gaokar (Bombay High Court)
 Maxopp Investment Ltd vs. CIT (Supreme Court)
 Order of a Four-Member Appellate Authority constituted under Chartered Accountants Act is Valid: Delhi HC

M/s TRG Packaging Pvt. Ltd. B-103, Lajpat Nagar New Delhi-24 Vs. ITO, Ward- 16(1), New Delhi
August, 03rd 2015
            DELHI BENCH : SMC-1 : NEW DELHI

                        ITA No.3462/Del/2015
                       Assessment Year : 2007-08

M/s TRG Packaging Pvt. Ltd.        Vs.          ITO, Ward-
B-103, Lajpat Nagar                             16(1),
New Delhi-24                                    New Delhi

PAN : AAACT 4624 L

       (Appellant)                            (Respondent)

            Appellant by : None
            Respondent by: Shri OM Prakash Meena, Sr. D.R.

            Date of Hearing:             31.07.2015
            Date of Pronouncement:       31.07.2015


       This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order passed by

 the CIT on 20.10.2014 in relation to Assessment Year 2007-08.

 2.    When the matter was called up for hearing today, no one has

 appeared on behalf of the assessee. The assessee has not filed any

 adjournment application also. The notice of hearing sent to the assessee

 has not been returned unserved. In these circumstances, it appears that
                                                               ITA No 3462/DEL/15

the assessee is not interested in prosecuting its appeal. The appeal filed

by the assessee is, therefore, liable to be dismissed, for non-

prosecution.      Our above view finds support from the following


    1. CIT vs. B.N. Bhattachargee & anr.', 118 ITR 461, wherein their
       Lordships have held:
              "The appeal does not mean merely filing of the appeal but
              effectively pursuing it."

    2. Estate of late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT', 223 ITR 480 (M.P.),
       wherein, while dismissing the reference made at the instance of
       the assessee in default, their Lordships made the following
              "If the party, at whose instance the reference is made, fails
              to appear at the hearing, or fails in taking steps for
              preparation of the reference, the court is not bound to
              answer the reference."

    3. Commissioner of Income-tax vs. Multiplan India (P.) Ltd', 38
       ITD 320 (Del.),wherein the appeal filed by the revenue before
       the Tribunal, was fixed for hearing. But on the date of hearing
       nobody        represented    the    revenue/appellant    nor          any
       communication for adjournment was received. There was no
       communication or information as to why the revenue chose to
       remain absent on that date.        The Tribunal on the basis of
       inherent powers, treated the appeal filed by the revenue as
                                                            ITA No 3462/DEL/15

       unadmitted in view of the provision of Rule 19 of the Income-
       tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963.

3.      In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed for


       The decision was pronounced in the open court on 31st July,


                                          (R.S. SYAL)
                                     ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Dated: 31st July, 2015


Copy forwarded to

1.    Appellant
2.    Respondent
3.    CIT
4.    CIT(A)
5.    DR
                                       Dy. Registrar, ITAT, New Delhi
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Software Development Software Programming Software Engineering Custom Software Development Requirement Based Software Development Software Solutions Software Serv

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions