Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
Popular Search: VAT RATES :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: due date for vat payment :: TDS :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: empanelment :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: form 3cd :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: VAT Audit :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: cpt :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company
« From the Courts »
 Group M. Media India Pvt. Ltd vs. UOI (Bombay High Court)
 Shreemati Devi vs. CIT (Allahabad High Court)
 Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
  Dr. Gautam Sen vs. CCIT (Bombay High Court)
 Dr. Gautam Sen vs. CCIT (Bombay High Court)
 DCIT vs. Shivshankar R. Sharma (ITAT Mumbai)
 ACIT vs. Jawaharlal Agicha (ITAT Mumbai)
 CIT vs. M/s. D. Chetan & Co (Bombay High Court)
 Makes further amendments to Notification no. 157/90-Customs dated 28th March, 1990 regarding temporary admission under the ATA Carnet
 Appointment of Common Adjudicating Authority by DGRI - 2/2016-Customs
 ransfers Of Hon’ble Members Of The ITAT (September 2016)

Sh. Dinesh Kumar Mangla R/o H. No. 1025, Village Prithla, Dist. Palwal, Haryana - 121102 Vs. ITO, Ward-1(2), CGO, Complex, NH-IV, aNew Delhi
August, 03rd 2015
            DELHI BENCH : SMC-1 : NEW DELHI

                        ITA No.3651/Del/2015
                       Assessment Year : 2010-11

Sh. Dinesh Kumar Mangla            Vs.           ITO, Ward-1(2),
R/o H. No. 1025, Village                         CGO, Complex,
Prithla, Dist. Palwal,                           NH-IV,
Haryana - 121102                                 New Delhi

       (Appellant)                             (Respondent)

            Appellant by : None
            Respondent by: Shri OM Prakash Meena, Sr. D.R.

            Date of Hearing:             31.07.2015
            Date of Pronouncement:       31.07.2015


       This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order passed by

 the CIT(A) on 17.04.2015 in relation to Assessment Year 2010-11.

 2.    When the matter was called up for hearing today, no one has

 appeared on behalf of the assessee. The assessee has not filed any

 adjournment application also. The notice of hearing sent to the assessee

 has not been returned unserved. In these circumstances, it appears that

 the assessee is not interested in prosecuting its appeal. The appeal filed
                                                               ITA No 3651/DEL/15

by the assessee is, therefore, liable to be dismissed, for non-

prosecution.      Our above view finds support from the following


    1. CIT vs. B.N. Bhattachargee & anr.', 118 ITR 461, wherein their
       Lordships have held:
              "The appeal does not mean merely filing of the appeal but
              effectively pursuing it."

    2. Estate of late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT', 223 ITR 480 (M.P.),
       wherein, while dismissing the reference made at the instance of
       the assessee in default, their Lordships made the following
              "If the party, at whose instance the reference is made, fails
              to appear at the hearing, or fails in taking steps for
              preparation of the reference, the court is not bound to
              answer the reference."

    3. Commissioner of Income-tax vs. Multiplan India (P.) Ltd', 38
       ITD 320 (Del.),wherein the appeal filed by the revenue before
       the Tribunal, was fixed for hearing. But on the date of hearing
       nobody        represented    the    revenue/appellant    nor          any
       communication for adjournment was received. There was no
       communication or information as to why the revenue chose to
       remain absent on that date.        The Tribunal on the basis of
       inherent powers, treated the appeal filed by the revenue as
       unadmitted in view of the provision of Rule 19 of the Income-
       tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963.
                                                            ITA No 3651/DEL/15

3.      In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed for


       The decision was pronounced in the open court on 31st July,


                                          (R.S. SYAL)
                                     ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Dated: 31st July, 2015


Copy forwarded to

1.    Appellant
2.    Respondent
3.    CIT
4.    CIT(A)
5.    DR
                                       Dy. Registrar, ITAT, New Delhi
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Our Mission

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions