sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Latest Expert Exchange
From the Courts »
 ACIT vs. Bharat V. Patel (Supreme Court)
 CIT vs. Shree Rama Multi Tech Ltd (Supreme Court)
 ITO vs. TechSpan India Private Ltd (Supreme Court)
 Eaton Fluid Power Limited vs. ACIT (ITAT Pune)
 Pr. CIT vs. Veedhata Tower Pvt. Ltd (Bombay High Court)
 Mahaveer Kumar Jain vs. CIT (Supreme Court)
  Shantivijay Jewels Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
 Minda SM Technocast Pvt. Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
 Meta Plast Engineering P. Ltd. vs. ITO (ITAT Delhi)
 Shantivijay Jewels Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
  Amod Shivlal Shah vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)

M/s. Goldman Sachs (India) Securities Pvt. Ltd. 951-A, Rational House Appasaheb Marathe Marg Prabhadevi Mumbai- 400 025 Vs. DCIT 3(1) Mumbai
August, 05th 2014
                        MUMBAI BENCH "K" MUMBAI


                            S.A. No. 201/Mum/2014
                    (Arising Out of ITA No. 222/Mum/2014)
                             Assessment Year: 2009-10

          M/s. Goldman Sachs (India)     DCIT 3(1)
          Securities Pvt. Ltd.           Mumbai
          951-A, Rational House
          Appasaheb Marathe Marg
          Prabhadevi Mumbai- 400 025
                (Applicant)                        (Respondent)

                     Permanent Account No. AAFCA 6819 F

                           Applicant by    :   Shri Madhur Agrawal
                          Respondent by    :   Shri Maurya Pratap

                       Date of hearing  : 01.08.2014
                  Date of Pronouncement : 01.08.2014



       By means of this present stay application, the assessee seeks to get extension
of the demand already stayed by the Tribunal for the assessment year 2009-2010 till
the final disposal of the appeal.

2.     We have heard the rival submissions and perused the relevant material on
record. It is seen that in this case the stay was earlier granted by the Tribunal in SA
No.17/Mum/2014 vide its order dated 31.01.2014 for a period of six months or till
the disposal of the appeal, whichever is earlier subject to payment of Rs.1 crore on
or before 15.03.2014. The Ld.Counsel for the assessee stated that the conditions
stipulated by the Tribunal in the said order of stay in respect of the payment of Rs. 1
crore has been duly complied with by the assessee and the case could not be taken
up for hearing due to certain reasons for which the assessee is not at fault. The
Ld.DR could not controvert these submissions made on behalf of the assessee.
                                                                                       S.A. No. 201/Mum/2014
                                            2                         (Arising Out of ITA No. 222/Mum/2014)
                                                                     M/s. Goldman Sachs (India) Securities Pvt. Ltd.
                                                                                       Assessment Year: 2009-10

3.     Taking into consideration of the entire factual position in this regard, we grant
the extension of stay of demand till the disposal of the present appeal or for a
further period of 180 days with effect from the date of expiry of the earlier stay
whichever is earlier. It has been brought to our notice that hearing of the appeal has
already been fixed by the Tribunal on 13.08.2014.             It is made clear that the
extension of stay is granted subject to the condition that the assessee will not seek
adjournment without just case. In case any adjournment is sought without good
reasons, the stay granted hereinabove shall automatically stand revoked, the case
will be de-listed from the priority list and it will come up for hearing in the normal
4. In the result, the stay application is allowed. Order pronounced in the open court on this 1st day of August, 2014. Sd/- Sd/- (D. KARUNAKAR RAO) (Dr. S.T.M. PAVALAN) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Mumbai, Dated: 01.08.2014 *Srivastava Copy to: The Appellant The Respondent The CIT, Concerned, Mumbai The CIT(A) Concerned, Mumbai The DR "K" Bench //True Copy// By Order Dy/Asstt. Registrar, ITAT, Mumbai.
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Our Portfolio

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions