Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court
 Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger
 Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court
 Delhi High Court Seeks Status Report from Centre for Appointments of Chairperson & Members in Adjudicating Authority Under PMLA
 Delhi High Court allows Income Tax Exemption to Charitable Society running Printing Press and uses Profit so generated for Charitable Purposes
 ITAT accepts Lease Income as Business Income as Business Investments were mostly in nature of Properties

Wasan Exports (P) Ltd., 5, Aradhana Enclave, R. K. Puram, Ring Road, New Delhi Vs. ACIT Circle-18(1) New Delhi
August, 05th 2014
                          INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                             DELHI BENCH "H": NEW DELHI
                     BEFORE SHRI R.S. SAYAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
                                            AND
                         SHRI A. T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER
                                    ITA No. 2197/Del/2013
                                    (Assessment Year: 2009-10)


                 Wasan Exports (P) Ltd.,            ACIT
                 5, Aradhana Enclave,           Vs. Circle-18(1)
                 R. K. Puram, Ring Road,            New Delhi
                 New Delhi
                 PAN:AAACW0159P
                 (Appellant)                         (Respondent)

                             Appellant by : None
                             Respondent by : Sameer Sharma, Sr. DR


                                           ORDER
PER A. T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER


      This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of the ld CIT(A)-XXI,
New Delhi dated 01.02.2013 for the Assessment Year 2009-10.

2.    Today, i.e. on 24.07.2014 when the case was called on board, none
appeared on behalf of the assessee nor any request for adjournment has been
filed before the Tribunal. It seems that the assessee is not interested in prosecuting
the appeal; hence, the appeal filed by the assessee is liable to be un-admitted and
dismissed for non-prosecution. In our above view, we find support from the following
decisions:-
(i). In the case of CIT Vs. B.N. Bhattachargee & Another 118 ITR 461 (relevant pages 477 & 478) wherein their Lordships have held that "The appeal does not mean merely filing of appeal but effectively pursuing it." (ii). In the case of Estate of Late Tukoji Rao Holker Vs. CWT 223 IR 480 (MP) while dismissing the reference made at the instance of assessee in default made following observations in their order: "if the party at whose instance the reference is made, fails to appear at the hearing, or fails in taking steps for preparation of the paper books so as to enable hearing of the reference, this court is not bound to answer the reference. Page No. 2 (iii). In the case of CIT Vs. Multiplan India Pvt. Ltd. 38 ITD 320 (del). The appeal filed by the revenue before the Tribunal which was fixed for hearing but on the date of hearing nobody represented the revenue / applicant, nor any communication for adjournment was received. There was no communication or information as to why revenue choose to remain absent on that date. The Tribunal on the basis of inherent power treated the appeal filed by the revenue as un-admitted in view of Rule 19 of the Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1963.
3. Therefore, keeping in view the above, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed for non-prosecution. The assessee, if so advised, shall be free to move this Tribunal praying for recalling of this order and explaining the reasons for non- compliance etc. and if the Bench is so satisfied about the reasons etc, then this order shall be recalled. 4. In the result, the assessee's appeal is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on 30.07.2014. -Sd/- -Sd/- (R.S. SAYAL) (A. T. VARKEY) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated:30/07/2014 A K Keot Copy forwarded to 1. Applicant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT (A) 5. DR:ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, New Delhi
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting