Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« Top Headlines »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Delhi HC Rules GST Registration Cannot Be Cancelled Retrospectively Without a Clear Show Cause Notice (SCN)
 Belated income tax return AY 2026-27: How to file, late filing charges and what you may lose
 Major Financial Changes from August 1, 2026: ITR Deadline, RBI MPC Meeting, Tatkal Ticket Rules & More
 Government proposes to ease tax relief conditions for offshore funds
 TallyPrime Connected Banking: Automating Banking and Accounting
 ITR Filing Deadline 2026: Is July 31 the Last Date to File Your Income Tax Return? Latest Official Update
 ITR filing deadline nears: How to file income tax return online on e-filing portal - quick 15-step guide
 Will the ITR Filing Deadline Be Extended Beyond July 31 for FY 2025-26? Here's the Latest Update for Taxpayers
 Income Tax Refund Delayed for AY 2026-27? 5 Common Reasons Your Refund May Be Stuck and How to Fix It
 ITR Filing 2026: FM Nirmala Sitharaman Asks Tax Officials to Let Honest Taxpayers Correct Genuine Mistakes
 Will Your FCNR Deposit Stay Tax-Free After Returning to India? Tax Rules Explained for NRIs

Flat buyers may not have to pay service tax
August, 08th 2006
You could well be spared from paying a 12.2% service tax on your dream house in a swank apartment complex. The government has made it clear that a builder or a realty developer who does construction work on his own will not have to pay service tax. Simply put, there will be no service tax on sale of a flat, which means the buyer will not have to bear any extra cost. Builders, though, are awaiting a final verdict from the Bombay High Court to seal the issue. Realty developers in the state Promoters and Builders Association of Pune and Maharashtra Chambers of Housing and Industry among others had moved the HC, challenging the governments move to levy service tax on sale of flats in housing complexes with more than 12 units. According to them, builders or realty developers per se were not service providers. Normally, the tax is levied on the service provider who, in turn, passes the burden on to the user (in this case, the owner of the flat). The finance ministrys Tax Research Unit (TRU) appears to have endorsed the builders stance, though the matter is still sub-judice. The TRU has clarified that a builder or a developer will not have to pay service tax if he does the construction on his own without engaging the services of any other person. In such cases in the absence of a service provider-service recipient relationship, the question of providing taxable service to any person by any other person does not arise, the clarification states. PBAP office bearers declined to comment as the matter is sub-judice. The clarification vindicates the stand taken by developers, said R Vasudevan, CMD, Vascon Engineering. Some builders, who have added the service tax component to the cost of the flat, have parked these proceeds in an escrow account. Its possible the money may be refunded. The finance ministry has, however, held that in a case where the builder, promoter or the developer builds a residential complex with more than 12 units by engaging a contractor, the contractor will be liable to pay service tax on the gross amount charged for construction services. Builders did not contest the levy of service tax on contractors. They have only opposed levy of service tax on the sale of a flat, said an industry analyst. Residential complexes were brought under the service tax net from June 05. The government had said service tax will be charged only on the value of the contract for constructing the block. Land value will be excluded while computing service tax. Further, the abatement of 67% on the value of the contract will be allowed if the construction contract is turnkey the contractor supplies the material and labour. PABP had filed a writ petition after show cause notices were issued by the revenue department to builders who did not pay the levy. Builders contended they are not liable to pay the levy simply because they have the rights to develop the property. They have cited a CBEC notification (September 04) which said estate builders who construct buildings or civil structures for their own use or rent it out or sell it out subsequently were not taxable service providers. However, if such real estate owners hire a contractor, payments made to them will attract service tax. However, the directorate of service tax went by a SC ruling which said that a works contract included in any agreement for carrying out either for cash or for deferred payment or for any valuable consideration, the building and construction of any movable or immovable property would attract a turnover tax.
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2026 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting