Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link:
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Popular Search: articles on VAT and GST in India :: VAT Audit :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: empanelment :: TDS :: VAT RATES :: cpt :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: form 3cd :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: due date for vat payment :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes
From the Courts »
 Virag Tiwari Vs. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-21 & Others
  Anand Agarwal vs. Vilas Chandrakant Gaokar (Bombay High Court)
 Maxopp Investment Ltd vs. CIT (Supreme Court)
 Order of a Four-Member Appellate Authority constituted under Chartered Accountants Act is Valid: Delhi HC
 Emami Infrastructure Ltd vs. ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
  Anand Agarwal vs. Vilas Chandrakant Gaokar (Bombay High Court)
 Bar Council of India vs. A. K. Balaji & Ors (Supreme Court)
 ITO vs. Venkatesh Premises Co-op Society Ltd (Supreme Court)
 Pr CIT vs. Amphenol Interconnect India P. Ltd (Bombay High Court)
 Pr CIT vs. Amphenol Interconnect India P. Ltd (Bombay High Court)
 Anand Agarwal vs. Vilas Chandrakant Gaokar (Bombay High Court)

Union Budget 2009-10: FM offers faster
July, 08th 2009

Disputes between multinational companies and Indian tax authorities now stand a better chance of quick resolution, with the government announcing the setting up of a collegium of commissioners to look into the issue.

Under the new scheme, proposed by finance minister Pranab Mukherjee in the Budget on Monday, the collegium will decide on all disputes between the tax department and the taxpayer. The collegium will comprise three members, and its order will be binding on the assessing officer.

Cross-border deals were brought under the capital gains tax net last year after the government woke up to the possibility of a tax revenue goldmine when British mobile giant Vodafone bought a controlling stake in Hutchison Essar for $11 billion. More such deals followed, with companies contesting the tax demand.

After the amendment of the relevant provision of the Income-Tax Act, the assessing officer is expected to send a draft order to the taxpayer-company. On the basis of the draft order, the company can approach the collegium of commissioners.

The change eliminates the forum of first appellate authority, the commissioner income-tax (appeal), or CIT (A). It also restricts the possibility of litigation by making the collegiums decision binding on the assessing officer. This is in total variance to the current practice, where any of the parties the department or the taxpayer can challenge the assessing officers decision before the first CIT (A).

The introduction of collegium of commissioners is a much healthier system than the existing one, which is a one man body, said Dinesh Kanabar, leader-taxation, PricewaterhouseCoopers.

However, the taxpayer can appeal against the decision taken by the collegium before the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), the second appellate body, and the final fact-finding authority on tax matters. The lack of safe harbour rules, so far, has paved way for a series of litigations ever since transfer pricing rules were introduced in 2001. The captive units of the outsourcing industry have been asking for such rules for some time. Safe harbour rules mean that if the variation between the margin declared by a taxpayer company and the estimate of the income-tax department is within a specific margin, for example 5%, the return filed by the corporate should be accepted by the tax authority.

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) will be framing the rules that would also specify the acceptable margins for different sectors. Safe harbour rules is currently in vogue among EU countries as well as in the US. The Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has suggested this measure in several of its orders on the disputes between MNCs and Indian tax authorities.

Said Samir Gandhi, partner, Deloitte Haskins: The objectives of safe harbour provisions confer a host of benefits to taxpayers and tax administrators. These include compliance relief, administrative simplicity and certainty. Many tax authorities apply safe harbour as a better administrative practice.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Web Application Development Web based Software Solution Web Application Deployment Web Application Solutions Web Application Software Development Web Application Deployment Web Application Programming Web Application Design and Development

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions