Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: TDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: VAT RATES :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: form 3cd :: cpt :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: VAT Audit :: due date for vat payment :: empanelment :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes
 
 
News Headlines »
 Is government tapping your phone?
 Income tax department to use analytics to look for discrepancies in bank accounts
 GST Council fails to break deadlock over indirect tax regime, next meet on Dec 11 and 12 to hammer out differences
 Invoking Writ Jurisdiction For Income Tax Matters
 How to file income-tax returns online
 How Income Tax Returns Are Scrutinised
 All About New Income Disclosure Scheme to make Demonetisation successful
 Your deposit may draw income tax notice
 Accepting payment under IDS 2016
 New disclosure scheme could see 50% tax and 4-year limit on cash use for unaccounted deposits
 Pay 50% tax on unaccounted deposits, or 85% if caught, says Modi government

Interest during twilight period
July, 21st 2007

In the Narsimha avatar, Lord Vishnu chose the twilight period to kill the demon king Hiranyan so as to honour the boon granted to him that he will not die during morning, evening or night.

The taxman might as well choose the twilight hour of acquisition of a house for denial of claim of interest as an expense while computing income from house property.

The Explanation to Section 24 says that interest payable or paid for the period prior to the date of acquisition or completion of construction to the extent it relates to the year prior to the beginning of the previous year in which such acquisition or completion is made is deductible in five equal instalments beginning with the first year after such acquisition or completion.

To wit, suppose one had taken the loan on April 1, 2006, and started construction immediately. And let us say the construction is completed on December 31, 2007.

Beginning with the previous year 2008-9, the interest for the period April 2006 to March 2007 can thus be claimed as deduction in five equal instalments. So far so good. But what happens to the interest from April 1, 2007, to March 31, 2008?

Preconstruction period

To be sure, the interest for the period January 1 to March 31, 2008, would qualify straightaway as expenditure for the previous year 2007-8 because it undoubtedly relates to the previous year in question.

But the interest for the period April 2007 to December 31, 2007, falls between the two stools and thus could go abegging if the taxman were to read the law strictly because the Explanation as pointed out earlier gives encouragement to the preconstruction period interest only to the extent it relates to the period preceding the previous year in which the house is completed.

And it does not make the grade for deduction in one shot for the previous year 2007-08 because the house property came into being as contemplated by Section 22 only on January 1, 2008, and therefore any interest for the period preceding this date will have to be treated as interest during the construction period.

Ironically though, it does not make the grade under the Explanation either for deduction over a period five years. Ousted by both the dispensations, an assessee could well find himself between the devil and the deep sea if the taxman were to exploit the twilight zone for the Revenues benefit.

Need for amendment

The Explanation thus needs to be amended retrospectively so as to confer the benefit of deduction over a period five years to the entire interest during the construction period.

To project the anomaly in sharp relief, let us assume in the above example that the loan was taken a year later, that is, on April 1, 2007, and the construction completed on December 31, 2007. In such a scenario, the entire preconstruction interest would fall by the wayside. Surely, this couldnt have been the legislative intent.

S. Murlidharan
(The author is a Delhi-based chartered accountant.)

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Our Mission

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions