Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link:
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Popular Search: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: VAT RATES :: due date for vat payment :: cpt :: form 3cd :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: VAT Audit :: TDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: empanelment
News Headlines »
 How to save income tax? Here are 6 investments with tax free income
 10 Top salary deductions that can save tax for you
 What are the tax saving options beyond Section 80C?
 The penalties for not paying tax on time
 How to make your salary tax efficient
 I-T Department may go into overdrive this quarter
 Ways to reduce the TDS deduction from your salary
 4 Tips for choosing who prepares your 2017 Tax Returns
 Processing of income-tax returns under section 143(1) of the Income-tax Act which were filed in Forms ITR-1 to 6 & applicability of section 143(1)(a)(vi)
 Price Waterhouse gets 2-year ban in Satyam case
 How to save income tax under section 80C

A breather for captive BPOs
July, 21st 2007

The Supreme Court has held that BPO companies in India doing back-office work for parent companies will not constitute a PE under Article 5(1) of the treaty.

Much of the uncertainty about taxation of captive BPOs has ended.

Establishing business units in other countries, either as subsidiaries or branch offices, is becoming commonplace for multinationals (MNCs) which want to expand their activities in the globalised world economy, and more so for IT majors, investment bankers and communication service companies. Subsidiaries registered in India are domestic companies taxable at 30 per cent. Other business outfits of foreign companies operating in India are taxed as non-domestic comp anies at 40 per cent, by recourse to the PE concept. Subsidiary companies of MNCs or their branches do multifarious work in India for their parent company thanks to lower employee cost and availability of suitable talent at short notice both for expanding business here and carrying out back-office work of the parent.

The Income-Tax Department wants its share of the global income of the MNCs when an Indian subsidiary does some work; under the PE rules, the subsidiary itself is an assessable unit as a domestic company, having been registered in India.

Uncertainty resolved

The uncertainty surrounding taxation of MNCs setting up captive BPO outfits seems to have been resolved, at least to some extent, with the apex court stating recently that the I-T Department cannot attempt to tax a part of the global incomes of an MNC by attributing it to its Indian BPOs as PE. So long as the back office services rendered to the parent are compensated on arms length basis, and the transaction falls under the purview of the transfer pricing chapter of the I-T Act, the department cannot drag in the parent to taxation in India under PE rules.

The Supreme Court upheld the views of the AAR (Authority of Advanced Ruling) that BPO companies in India doing back-office work for parent companies will not constitute a PE under Article 5(1) of the treaty. On a functional and factual analyses of the activities done for the parent company, the back-office work will not amount to carrying on the business of the parent from a fixed place of business. This BPO service is legitimately compensated by the parent company to its Indian subsidiary on arms length basis

It also confirmed that as the BPO arm in India has no power to conclude any contract on behalf of the parent company, it does not give rise to agency PE under Article 5(4)

The contention of both the appellant and the Department was whether it would be a service PE under Article 5(2)(i) on different counts. The Supreme Court upheld the appellants view that stewardship activity will not lend support to applying Article 5(2)(i) and, therefore, the BPO centre will not be a PE.

This is so held for the reason that the parent company is interested in the confidentiality and the quality of work.

Monitoring the work by sending its employees as stewards, the parent company protects its interests and achieves the aforementioned purpose. When the Indian subsidiary company draws employees from the parent company on deputation for assisting in performance of its duties, the apex courts opinion seems to favour the Department in that there is service PE, as the work of the parent company is sought to be done on Indian soil. And to this extent, the the apex courts view leaves scope for further doubts.

Impact of the decision

Though much of the uncertainty about taxation of captive BPOs has ended, the deputation issues may pose some problem at the time of assessment of the Indian subsidiary as assessable unit in respect of income earned here. Attribution of a portion of its profits to the part performed by the deputationists and assessability in the hands of the parent company might lead to litigation.

Here again, the argument could be that so long as the cost of deputation is paid by the subsidiary on arms length basis, the transaction might be one of transfer pricing transaction and subject to compliance under that chapter. Even so, trying to carve out a portion of the pie towards income under the PE route may not have any legitimacy.

R. Bupathy
(The author is a practising chartered accountant)
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Website Ranking Website Ranking Company Website Positioning Alexa Ranking Website Promotion Website top 10 ranking website top 10 promotion search engine result promotion Strategic Internet Marketing Website Optimization Website Ranking Factors

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions