Latest Expert Exchange Queries

Make your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft info@binarysoft.com
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: VAT Audit :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: cpt :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: empanelment :: form 3cd :: TDS :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: due date for vat payment :: VAT RATES :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
 
 
From the Courts »
 Canyon Financial Services Ltd Vs. Income Tax Officer
 Chintels India Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax – Circle 8
 Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs. International Tractors Ltd.
 Hcl Technologies Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle-2 & Anr.
 New Delhi Television Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
 John Fowler (India) Pvt. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
 CIT vs. The Mumbai Metropolitan Regional Iron and Steel Market Committee (Bombay High Court)
 KSS Petron Private Ltd vs. ACIT (Bombay High Court)
 JK Mittal & Co vs. UOI (No. 2) (Delhi High Court)
 Pr CIT vs. Shri Mahila Sewa Sahakari Bank Ltd (Gujarat High Court)
 Pr CIT Vs. PPC Business And Products Pvt Ltd (Delhi High Court)

Sub-Registrar-II-Registrar Sadar, Budaun, Kachari Road, Civil Lines, Badaun. Vs. DIT (I &CI), Dtrti Building, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow-226010.
June, 19th 2015
                IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                      DELHI BENCH: `G' NEW DELHI

               BEFORE SMT DIVA SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER
                                   AND
                  SH. N.K.SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

                           I.T.A .No.-3616/Del/2013
                         (ASSESSMENT YEAR-2011-12)

     Sub-Registrar-II-Registrar Sadar,    vs   DIT (I &CI),
     Budaun, Kachari Road, Civil Lines,        Dtrti Building,
     Badaun.                                   Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar,
     PAN-LKNO05298G                            Lucknow-226010.
     (APPELLANT)                               (RESPONDENT)

                   Appellant by     None
                   Respondent by    Sh.B.R.R.Kumar, Sr. DR

                       Date of Hearing          18.06.2015
                    Date of Pronouncement       18.06.2015

                                   ORDER
PER DIVA SINGH, JM

       The present appeal has been filed by the assessee assailing the
correctness of the order dated 23.06.2013 of DIT (I&CI), Lucknow pertaining
to F.Y. 2010-11.
2. However, at the time of hearing, no one was present on behalf of the assessee. The record shows that on the two occasions when the appeal came up for hearing i.e 10.12.2013 & 09.06.2014, no one was present on behalf of the assessee. Even, at the time of present hearing no one was present. The appeal was passed over. In the second round also, the position remained the same. Apart from the fact that on the dates of hearing mentioned above, the assessee remained unrepresented, it is further seen that the defect notice issued by the Registry on 11.09.2013 remains not cured till date. Accordingly in the absence of any representation or petition seeking time, it can be safely presumed that the assessee is not serious in pursuing the present appeal. In the circumstances, the only alternative left is to dismiss the appeal of the assessee in limine. Support is drawn from the order of the Tribunal in I.T.A .No.-3616/Del/2013 Commissioner of Income-Tax vs. Multi Plan India (P) Ltd.; 38 ITD 320 (Del) and Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT: 223 ITR 480 (M.P). 3. Before parting it is appropriate to add that in case the assessee is able to show that there was a reasonable cause for non-representation on the date of hearing then it may if so advised pray for a recall of this order and decisions on merits. The said order was pronounced on the date of hearing itself in the open Court.
4. As a result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. The order is pronounced in the open court on 18th of June 2015. Sd/- Sd/- (N.K.SAINI) (DIVA SINGH) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 18/06/2015 *Amit Kumar* Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(Appeals) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT NEW DELHI Page 2 of 2
 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Application Management Solutions Application Management System Application Management Software System Application Management Development Application Management Software Development

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions