Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
Popular Search: TDS :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: form 3cd :: cpt :: VAT Audit :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: VAT RATES :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: empanelment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: due date for vat payment
« From the Courts »
  Dr. Gautam Sen vs. CCIT (Bombay High Court)
 Dr. Gautam Sen vs. CCIT (Bombay High Court)
 DCIT vs. Shivshankar R. Sharma (ITAT Mumbai)
 ACIT vs. Jawaharlal Agicha (ITAT Mumbai)
 CIT vs. M/s. D. Chetan & Co (Bombay High Court)
 Makes further amendments to Notification no. 157/90-Customs dated 28th March, 1990 regarding temporary admission under the ATA Carnet
 Appointment of Common Adjudicating Authority by DGRI - 2/2016-Customs
 ransfers Of Hon’ble Members Of The ITAT (September 2016)
 M. G. Contractors Pvt. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
 Haryana State Road & Bridges Development Corporation Ltd vs. CIT (P&H High Court)
 Dharamshibhai Sonani vs. DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)

Sumit Kumar Bagra, C/o M/s Vaishali Creation, B-12, Hathi Khana, Azad Market, 1st Floor, New Delhi. Vs. ITO, Ward 39(1), New Delhi.
June, 19th 2015
             DELHI BENCH : SMC : NEW DELHI

                          ITA No.623/Del/2014
                        Assessment Year : 2006-07

Sumit Kumar Bagra,                 Vs.          ITO,
C/o M/s Vaishali Creation,                      Ward 39(1),
B-12, Hathi Khana,                              New Delhi.
Azad Market, 1st Floor,
New Delhi.


     (Appellant)                             (Respondent)

           Appellant by : None
           Respondent by: Shri Neehar Ranjan Pandey, Addl.CIT
           Date of Hearing         : 17.06.2015
           Date of Pronouncement   : 17.06.2015


     This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the

CIT(A) on 29.11.2013 in relation to Assessment Year 2006-07.

2.   When the matter was called up for hearing today, no one has appeared

on behalf of the assessee. The assessee has also not filed any adjournment

application. The notice of hearing sent to the assessee has not been returned
                                                              ITA No.623/Del/2014   2

unserved. In these circumstances, it appears that the assessee is not

interested in prosecuting his appeal. The appeal filed by the assessee is,

therefore, liable to be dismissed, for non-prosecution. Our above view

finds support from the following decisions:-

    1. CIT vs. B.N. Bhattachargee & anr.', 118 ITR 461, wherein their
       Lordships have held:
           "The appeal does not mean merely filing of the appeal but
           effectively pursuing it."

    2. Estate of late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT', 223 ITR 480 (M.P.),
       wherein, while dismissing the reference made at the instance of the
       assessee   in   default,   their   Lordships   made   the   following
           "If the party, at whose instance the reference is made, fails to
           appear at the hearing, or fails in taking steps for preparation of
           the reference, the court is not bound to answer the reference."

    3. Commissioner of Income-tax vs. Multiplan India (P.) Ltd', 38 ITD
       320 (Del.),wherein the appeal filed by the revenue before the
       Tribunal, was fixed for hearing. But on the date of hearing nobody
       represented the revenue/appellant nor any communication for
       adjournment was received.          There was no communication or
       information as to why the revenue chose to remain absent on that
       date. The Tribunal on the basis of inherent powers, treated the
       appeal filed by the revenue as unadmitted in view of the provision
       of Rule 19 of the Appellate Rules, 1963.
                                                             ITA No.623/Del/2014   3

3.     In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed for non-


      The decision was pronounced in the open court on 17th June, 2015.

                                                  (R.S. SYAL)
                                             ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Dated: 17th June, 2015.


Copy forwarded to

1.   Appellant
2.   Respondent
3.   CIT
4.   CIT(A)
5.   DR
                                           Dy. Registrar, ITAT, New Delhi
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Website Ranking Website Ranking Company Website Positioning Alexa Ranking Website Promotion Website top 10 ranking website top 10 promotion search engine result promotion Strategic Internet Marketing Website Optimization Website Ranking Factors

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions