Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link: https://ims.go2customer.com
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft info@binarysoft.com
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: articles on VAT and GST in India :: VAT Audit :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: VAT RATES :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: TDS :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: empanelment :: form 3cd :: cpt :: due date for vat payment :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company
 
 
ITAT-Constitution of Benches »
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Benches, Hyderabad. Cause List Of Cases Posted Before A-Bench (Db&Smc ) - 22.01.2018 To 25.01.2018
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Chennai Benches Chennai Constitution for the week from 22/01/2018 To 25/01/2018 (26/01/2018 Declared As Closed Holidav)
 ICAI has clarified that there is no error in the results of CA Final examination held in November 2017 declared on Jan. 17
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal : Mumbai Consolidated list of orders ready for Pronouncement on 19/01/2018
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal : Kolkata Benches : Kolkata. Sub : Cause List For The Cases Fixed On Friday The 19/01/2018
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Consolidated list of orders ready for Pronouncement on 19/01/2018
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Benches Cause List Of DB For The Week Ending On 12/01/2018
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Pune Benches Cause List for Bench "B"for the week ending 19/01/2018
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Mumbai Benches Mumbai Constitution of Benches for the Period from 22/01/2018 To 25/01/2018
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam Bench During The Period From 15.01.2018 To 26.01.2018
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Benches, Hyderabad. Cause List Of Cases Posted Before B-Bench (DB) - 15.01.18 To 19.01.18

S. Vinodkumar Diamonds Pvt. Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
May, 08th 2013

S. 43(5): Loss on foreign currency forward contracts by a manufacturer/ exporter is a “speculation loss” and not a “hedging loss”

The assessee, a dealer in diamonds, entered into forward contracts in US dollars. Some of the contracts were cancelled during the year and some were outstanding at the end of the year. The assessee suffered a loss of Rs. 4.02 crores on account of the cancellation and “marked to market” of the said forward contracts and claimed that sum as a deduction. The AO & CIT(A), relied on Instruction No. 03/2010 dated 23-3-2010 and held that the said loss arose on account of a “speculative transaction” while the assessee claimed that it arose out of a “hedging transaction”. HELD by the Tribunal:

There is a difference between a “speculative transaction” and a “hedging transaction”. S. 43(5) defines a “speculative transaction” to mean a transaction in which a contract for the purchase or sale of any commodity, including stocks and shares, is periodically or ultimately settled otherwise than by the actual delivery or transfer of the commodity or scrips. Proviso (a) to s. 43(5) refers to a “hedging transaction” as a contract in respect of raw materials or merchandise entered into by a person in the course of his manufacturing or merchandising business to guard against loss through future price fluctuations in respect of his contracts for actual delivery of goods manufactured by him or merchandise sold by him. In order for a transaction to be a “hedging transaction”, the commodity dealt in should be the same. If the subject matter of the transaction is different, it cannot be termed a hedging transaction. Also, the merchandise in respect of which the forward transactions have been entered into by the assessee must have a direct connection with the goods sold by him. On facts, as the assessee was not dealing in Foreign Exchange, the forward transactions entered into by it cannot be held to be hedging transactions. As the assessee is dealing in diamonds, only the forward contracts entered into for diamonds would be covered by Proviso (a) to s. 43(5). Consequently, the loss suffered by the assessee is a speculative loss.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Quality Assurance Services Testing and Re-testing

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions