Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: form 3cd :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: due date for vat payment :: empanelment :: cpt :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: TDS :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: VAT RATES :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: VAT Audit :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD
 
 
ITAT-Constitution of Benches »
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Benches, Bangalore. Constitution For The week 20.03.2017 To 23.03.2017.
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Benches, Hyderabad. Constitution For The Period From 20.03.2017 To 30.03.2017.
 Income Tax Appellate Trtbunal Kolkata Benches Kolkata Causelist For Bench 'A' Sub Case list for the period from 20/03/2017 To 23/03/2017 (24/03/2017 is M.A.Day)
 Income Tax Appellate Trtbunal Chennai Benches Chennai Constitution For The Week From 2010312017 To 2310312017
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Ahmedabad Benches , Ahmedabad S/shri Rajpal Yadav, Jm & N.K. Billaiya, Am Causelist For Bench 'A' Date : 20/03/2017
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal: Panaji Bench: Panaji Cause List For The Week From 20.03.2017 To 31.03.2017 Before Shri P. K. Bansal-Am And Shri George Mathan – Jm
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal New Delhi Bench New Delhi Constitution of Benches from 20.03.2017
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Pune Bench Pune Causelist for Bench 'A' For the Week Ending 24/03/2017
 Income tax Appellate Tribunal : Kolkata Benches : Mumbai Benches Mumbai Consolidated Cause list of SA MA Pronouncement for friday 17/03/2017
 Income tax Appellate Tribunal : Kolkata Benches : Kolkata Constitution of Kolkata Benches From 20/03/2017 To 23/03/2017 (24th march, 2017 day)
 Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Benches : New Delhi stay list dated 15.03.17

Vodafone India Services Pvt. Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
May, 14th 2013

Transfer Pricing: “High End” Cos in ITES/BPO sector comparable to “Low End” ones

The assessee raised three contentions in support of the contention that its charges were at ALP: (i) that the assessee was engaged in the “low end” activity of “voice based call centre” and that the comparables chosen by the TPO were not functionally comparable as they were engaged in the “high end” activity of “knowledge process outsourcing (KPO)“, “software development” etc, (ii) that the margin has to be computed on the basis of return on asset employed (ROA) or on capital employed (ROCE) and not on the basis of operating cost & (iii) that as its income was exempt u/s 10A, there was no ‘tax avoidance‘ and the transfer pricing provisions could not apply. HELD by the Tribunal:

(i) The argument that the ITES/BPO industry has several segments starting from low end segment such ‘call centre’, ‘customer care’ to high end segments such as ‘KPO’, ‘content development’ etc. in which there is wide variation in the billing rates and that high end services are not comparable to the low end services is not acceptable because under Rule 10B(2) the comparability of an international transaction with an uncontrolled transaction has to be judged with the reference to the services provided, functions performed, asset employed and risk assumed. All companies which are in the ITES segment are providing similar services and difference is in the internal working which is reflected through difference in qualifications and skills of the employees. The difference in skill/ qualification of the employees and their payment structure and the difference in billing rate does not affect the comparability in any significant manner under TNMM;

(ii) Though Rule 10B(1)(e) gives the option of computing the margin in relation to asset employed (ROA or ROCE), the OECD and the United Nations TP manual provide that ROCA/ROA are suitable only for manufacturing and other capital or asset intensive industries and not for the service sector. In the case of service companies, the main asset is employees which is not reflected in the balance sheet and, therefore, ROCA/ROA will not be an appropriate method for the purpose of computation of margin;

(iii) The argument that as the assessee’s income is exempt u/s 10A, there was no tax avoidance in transferring profit to a low tax jurisdiction is not acceptable because the law has to be applied as enacted. There is no provision in the transfer pricing regulations that for applying the said provisions the revenue has to prove tax avoidance. Once there is a international transaction, the ALP has to be computed as per the prescribed methods.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Multi-level Marketing MLM India Affiliate Marketing Affiliate Marketing Software MLM Software MLM Solutions Multi level marketing solutions MLM Servi

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions