sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Latest Expert Exchange
From the Courts »
  Suresh M. Jamkhindikar vs. ACIT (Bombay High Court)
 Mangammal @ Thulasi vs. T.B. Raju (Supreme Court)
 Mahabir Industries vs. PCIT (Supreme Court)
  Oriental Bank Of Commerce Vs. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax
  Suresh M. Jamkhindikar vs. ACIT (Bombay High Court)
  Union of India vs. Pirthwi Singh (Supreme Court)
 Cromption Greaves Limited vs. CIT (ITAT Mumbai)
 Director Of Income Tax Vs. M/s. Modiluft Ltd.
 Director Of Income Tax Vs. M/s. Royal Airways Ltd.
 Lally Motors India (P.) Ltd vs. PCIT (ITAT Amritsar)
  Mehsana District Co-operative vs. DCIT (Gujarat High Court)

SC exempts Aussie company from fringe benefit tax
May, 23rd 2008

In the first ever judgement on the fringe benefit tax, the Supreme Court has held that an Australian company R&B Falcon (A) Pty Ltd, a service provider in the offshore oil drilling businesses, spending money on transporting people to manage rigs in waters off the Indian coast is not liable to pay FBT.

The controversial tax, which was introduced in the Finance Act 2005 by Finance Minister P Chidambaram, was a levy on the employer in relation to fringe benefits and perquisites enjoyed by employees, in cases where it was not possible to identify the individual tax base.

The Act came into force with effect from April 1, 2006. The object for imposition of the said tax was to bring about horizontal equity and not a vertical equity.

While setting aside the Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) decision, which held FBT can be levied on the transport expenses incurred by the company, a bench headed by Justice S B Sinha held that R&B Falcon was a not liable to pay FBT on the transportation cost incurred by it in providing transport facility for movement of offshore employees from their residence in home country to the place of work and back.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Quality Assurance Services Testing and Re-testing

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions