|
|
|
| « From the Courts » |
|---|
Court On Its Own Motion vs. CIT (Delhi High Court) | Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-9, New Delhi Room No. 357, ARA Centre, E-2 vs. M/s Moets Bar-B-Cue,50, Defence Colony Market, New Delhi 110 024 PAN/GIR NO. : AAAFM7936M | ADIT, Cir. 1(1), (Intl. Taxation), 204, Drum Shape Building, IP Estate, New Delhi 110 002 vs. Ms. Meena Chopra, P-13, Ground Floor,Malviya Nagar, New Delhi | CIT vs. Awadh Hotels (P) Ltd (Allahabad High Court) | BEFORE SHRI H.L.KARWA, HON'BLE, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI MEHAR SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER | BEFORE SHRI H.L.KARWA, HON'BLE, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI T.R.SOOD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER | Mehsana Circle Vs Mehsana M/s.Shree Riddhi Corporation 32, Amikunj Society Near Technical School, Kalol | ITO, Ward 40(3), Room No. 307, Mayur Bhavan, vs. Sh. Mohan Lal Walia, Through L/H Mrs. Prem Walia, G-251, Palam Vihar, Gurgaon, | M/s. All Cargo Global Logistics Ltd.5th Floor, Diamond Square, C.S.T. Road, Kalina, Santacruz (E),Mumbai – 400 098. | Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 6(1), Room No. 413, CR Building, New Delhi vs. Maharani Paints India Pvt. Ltd., TA-3/146-C, Tuglakabad Extn.,New Delhi | Income Tax Officer, Ward 38(2), Room No. 234A, 2nd floor, CR Bldg., IP Estate, New Delhi vs. Sh. Naresh Kumar Through Legal Heir Sh. Naveen Kumar, 9307, Gaushala Marg, Kishan Ganj Delhi – 110 006 |
|
|
|
|
|
| « Exhibition cost in 1st fiscal too is business expense: ITAT... | SC exempts Aussie company from fringe benefit tax... » |
Income tax appellate tribunal allows tax benefits on first-year exhibition costs |
|
|
| May, 27th 2008 |
Corporates can add expenditure incurred in exhibitions as business expenses for claiming tax benefits, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal said in a recent decision.
ITAT gave the ruling was in a case pertaining to the Indian subsidiary of Austrian auto component manufacturer Styler Daimler Puch.
Exhibitions are aimed at propagating business and hence cannot be disallowed for claiming tax benefits by the tax department, ITAT president Vimal Gandhi said while turning down the decision of the assessing officer and commissioner of Income Tax (CIT), Pune.
The case pertains to participation of the Austrian company that set up its subsidiary Styler India, within months of the "Autoexpo 1998" exhibition. The company had included an expenditure of Rs15 lakh in its annual expenses.
While the company claimed the amount as business expenditure, the assessing officer disallowed it saying it cannot claim deductions as it had not started business then.
ITAT, however, ruled that once it was proved that the expense was incurred after the business was set up, the expenses of revenue nature incurred will become admissible for deduction.
|
|
|