sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Latest Expert Exchange
News Headlines »
 Income Tax Return filing 2018: Here are some important tips for you
 Change in Examination Venue in Thane, Zone – II, May 2018 Examinations
 Here’s all you need to know New Income Tax return for salaried class available on IT portal
 What to do if you missed the (second) tax deadline
 Income-tax (5th Amendment) Rules, 2018 - Notification under section 9A (3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in respect of Fund Manager Regime
 Income Tax department warns salaried class again filing wrong ITRs
 ITR-1 form for AY 18-19 now available for e-filing
 New Income Tax Return Form for Salaried Class available in Portal
 Income Tax Return: ITR-1 ready for e-filing, says I-T department
 6 Tax changes you need to keep in mind while filing ITR for FY17-18 Income Tax Return efiling
 Income-tax (5th Amendment) Rules, 2018

At a loss on filing returns
May, 19th 2007
With the intention of the legislature not clear on filing of returns by a loss-making outfit, decisions will continue to be based more on facts than on law.

A taxpayer is obliged to file return of income only when he has income chargeable to tax. An agriculturist having no income whatsoever from any other source need not look into the provisions of Income-Tax Act, 1961. Whether a businessman incurring losses must file return of income is an issue for which there is no direct answer in the statute.

Who must file return of loss?

Only companies and firms have to furnish return of loss compulsorily. For firms this dictum is applicable from the assessment year 2006-07 onwards. For individual and HUF (Hindu undivided family) taxpayers there is no compulsion to file the return except the incentive of set-offs contained in the Act.

To meet the contingency of rectifying the mistakes in the return filed by the taxpayers, the statute provides a leeway by allowing revision of returns. An assessee having suffered loss and filed a return already, can revise the return and enhance or reduce the loss has been debated at various points of time.

The Madras High Court in Periyar District Milk Producers Union vs CIT (266 ITR 705) has held that if the original return declaring loss is filed before the `due date', a revised return enhancing the claim of loss could be filed within the time prescribed under Section 139(5).

Reduction of loss

If the returned loss is reduced by the Assessing Officer will the assessee be liable for concealment penalty was discussed by the apex court in CIT vs Prithipal Singh (249 ITR 670 SC). The decision was in favour of the assessee.

By the Finance Act, 2002, the legislature nullified the impact of judgment by prescribing that the quantum of loss so reduced shall be taken as the concealed income for the purpose of computing penalty. However, the change is effective from April 1, 2003.

The moot questions are: (i) whether the change of law with effect from. April 1, 2003 is applicable in respect of assessments completed on or after that date? Or (ii) is it applicable in respect of losses determined for the assessment year 2003-04 onwards?

In CIT vs Chemiequip (265 ITR 265), the Bombay High Court held that the amendment of the Finance Act, 2002 as clarificatory in nature and applicable for the assessment years preceding the assessment year 2003-04 also.

Safe way out?

Recently, in CIT vs Bacardi Martini India Ltd (288 ITR 585 Delhi), the assessee filed a return declaring loss of Rs14.56 crore. Later the assessee filed a revised return declaring loss of Rs13.14 crore by withdrawing certain expenditures claims. The Assessing Officer (AO) completed the assessment by fixing the loss at Rs11.38 crore. The facts of the case related to the assessment year 2001-02.

The first appellate authority the CIT (Appeals) cancelled the penalty imposed by the AO. The Tribunal held that the assessee had furnished necessary details with self-explanatory notes. There was no finding in the assessment order of the AO that the assessee did not furnish complete particulars or details called for. The disallowance of expenditure was due to the difference of opinion between the assessee and the AO and the revised return was not as a result of any discovery by the AO. The court, without adverting to the application of the amendment to the assessment year in question, toed the line of the ITAT and gave reprieve to the assessee.

Had the memorandum explaining the provisions been clear about the intention of the legislature in amending the provision, the needless litigation on the application of the amended provision could be avoided. Else decisions will continue to be based more on facts than on law.

V. K. Subramani
(The author is an Erode-based chartered accountant.)

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Website Ranking Website Ranking Company Website Positioning Alexa Ranking Website Promotion Website top 10 ranking website top 10 promotion search engine result promotion Strategic Internet Marketing Website Optimization Website Ranking Factors

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions