News shortcuts: From the Courts | Top Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | Professional Updates | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Transfer Pricing »
 National High Speed Rail Corporation Limited, New Delhi, Delhi
 Deals of the day-Mergers and acquisitions September 3, 2019
 Transfer pricing documentation due by year-end
 Transfer pricing amendments – a step towards certainty
 key international tax and transfer pricing developments
 Transfer pricing methodology of MNCs under customs department lens
 MNCs now won't have to file CbC report in Indiaa
 Citing Supreme Court’s Vodafone order, Bombay HC rejects transfer pricing adjustment
 General Insurance Corporation Of India, Mumbai, Maharashtra
 Air India Limited, Multi Location, Multi State
  Edcil India Limited, New Delhi
 Edcil India Limited, New Delhi
 Indian tax authority sets new CbC reporting deadline for US subsidiaries
 Private Company, New Delhi
 Motilal Nehru National Institute Of Technology, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh

Citing Supreme Courts Vodafone order, Bombay HC rejects transfer pricing adjustment
March, 08th 2019

Relying on the Supreme Court’s verdict in the Vodafone case related to transfer pricing adjustment (TPA), the Bombay High Court upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruling that had struck down the adjustments made by the taxman on an Indian company for buying shares in a fully-owned Dubai-based subsidiary on its capital account.

The assessee, PMP Auto Components, paid `2.67 crore to its subsidiary for buying shares having fair market value of `8.13 lakh. The I-T department sought to tax this difference — `2.58 crore for assessment year 2010-11.

HC observed that the assessee had purchased the shares on capital account, which renders the transactions arms length pricing moot as it wouldn’t have any bearing on profits of the Indian entity. “The issue arising here stands concluded by the decision of this Court in Vodafone,” the order said. This view taken in Vodafone case was also subsequently accepted by CBDT in 2015.

The department argued that the Vodafone case was different owing to ‘inbound investment’ while this case dealt with ‘inbound investment’. The court, however, said the department had to prove that income was arising from the transaction for taxability to come into picture. “The distinction between inbound and outbound investment is a distinction which does not take the case of revenue any further…” the order said.

Further, ITD argued that there may be reduction of tax liability in future if assessee sold these shares at a loss as they had purchased the same at a much higher price than FMV. The court said: “This submission is in the realm of speculation… No provision of the Act has been shown to us, which would allow Revenue to tax a potential income in the present facts.”

Amit Agarwal, Partner- Transfer Pricing at Nangia Advisors (Andersen Global) said: “What’s intriguing is the revenue department’s insistence on moving the matter to the High Court despite the SC decision in case of Vodafone which unequivocally said that provisions of transfer pricing shall not be applicable, where the transaction does not give rise to any income.”

He added that the ruling reiterated the principle ‘existence of income’ for application of transfer pricing adjustment.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2020 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting