Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link: https://ims.go2customer.com
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft info@binarysoft.com
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: VAT RATES :: cpt :: empanelment :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: form 3cd :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: TDS :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: VAT Audit :: due date for vat payment
 
 
News Headlines »
 The penalties for not paying tax on time
 How to make your salary tax efficient
 I-T Department may go into overdrive this quarter
 Ways to reduce the TDS deduction from your salary
 4 Tips for choosing who prepares your 2017 Tax Returns
 Processing of income-tax returns under section 143(1) of the Income-tax Act which were filed in Forms ITR-1 to 6 & applicability of section 143(1)(a)(vi)
 Price Waterhouse gets 2-year ban in Satyam case
 How to save income tax under section 80C
 These four expenditures can help you save tax under section 80C
 How to avoid excess deduction of TDS from salary income
 Income-tax deduction from salaries during the financial year 2017-18 under section 192 of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Delhi High Court upholds tax relief to Goodyear
March, 12th 2013

The Delhi high court recently dismissed a writ petition filed by the tax department relating to transfer of shares of an Indian listed company between two non-resident entities.

In this case, US-based GoodyearBSE 0.12 % Tire and Rubber Company transferred its holding of 74% shares in Goodyear IndiaBSE 0.12 % to its Singapore subsidiary without any consideration.

The Authority for Advance Rulings (AAR) had ruled in 2011 that this particular transaction would not be subject to tax in India. The tax department filed a writ petition in the high court challenging the ruling.

Long-term capital gain on the sale of listed shares in the country is exempt from tax in India. Only securities transaction tax is paid on such deals. Capital gain is considered to be long-term if the shares listed in India are sold after a holding period of 12 months.

Given the facts of the case, the AAR had held that even if the 74% shareholding was transferred for a consideration and capital gains had arisen, it would be exempt from tax in India. Goodyear India was listed in India and the shares were a long-term capital asset in the hands of the US company, which was the transferor.

The high court accepted AAR's view. While dismissing the writ petition, the high court emphasized that it was not exercising any appellate jurisdiction. The tax authorities by filing a writ had only invoked the extra-ordinary jurisdiction granted under the Constitution to the high courts.

No illegality was pointed out in the AAR ruling and the high court saw no reason to interfere with it. Both the AAR order and the Delhi high court's ruling should now be read together.

Writ petitions filed by taxpayers are pending with various high courts. Some taxpayers, on the basis of the Goodyear order, fear that high courts may not intervene at all with an earlier order of the AAR. Thus, there will be no practical recourse available against an unfavourable AAR order.

Mukesh Butani, chairman of BMR Advisors, who represented Goodyear, said, "The dismissal of the writ petition in this case should not been seen as the reluctance of the high court to interfere with an earlier order of the AAR. In Goodyear's case, the court saw no necessity or reason to intervene in the order."

In its petition, the tax department had contended that the transaction between the US and Singapore companies involved treaty shopping. If the shares were sold by a US company, then under the India-US tax treaty, the capital gains would be subject to tax both in India and the US.

However, if the shares were sold by the Singapore company, the capital gains would be taxed only in Singapore under the India-Singapore tax treaty.

In view of the fact that India doesn't impose tax on long-term capital gains arising on transfer of listed shares of an Indian company, these arguments of the tax department were held to be inconsequential.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Application Management Solutions Application Management System Application Management Software System Application Management Development Application Management Software Development

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions