Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link: https://ims.go2customer.com
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft info@binarysoft.com
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: cpt :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: due date for vat payment :: TDS :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: empanelment :: form 3cd :: VAT RATES :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: VAT Audit :: list of goods taxed at 4%
 
 
ICAI »
 ICAI has clarified that there is no error in the results of CA Final examination held in November 2017 declared on Jan. 17,
 Exposure Draft of Appendix C, Uncertainty over Income Tax Treatments to Ind AS 12, Income Taxes
 Group to study how Government Departments deal with non-performing employees and to identify non-performers in ICAI
 Result of the Chartered Accountants Final Examination held in November 2017 and Common Proficiency Test (CPT) held in December 2017 declared.
 Result of the Information Systems Audit [ISA] Assessment Test held on 23rd December 2017 declared.
 Result of the Chartered Accountants Final Examination held in November 2017 and Common Proficiency Test (CPT) held in December 2017 and the ISA-AT held in December 2017 are likely to be declared on Wednesday, the 17th January 2018
 Ind AS Transition Facilitation Group (ITFG) Clarification Bulletin 13
 CPE Events 15 January - 20 January 2018
 Result of the Information Systems Audit [ISA] Assessment Test held on 23rd December 2017 is likely to be declared on 17th January, 2018.
 Result of the Chartered Accountants Final Examination held in November 2017 and Common Proficiency Test (CPT) held in December 2017 are likely to be declared on Wednesday, the 17th January 2018.
 Clarifications on the requirement for completion of Advanced ICITSS course and the Advanced IT Test thereunder, with reference to eligibility to appear in CA Final examination, under Final( Old) and Final (New) Syllabus.

Need for states to boost own tax & non-tax revenues
February, 26th 2014

While presenting Interim Budget 2014 last week, finance minister Palaniappan Chidambaram announced path-breaking fiscal devolution and decentralisation that his successor would do well to continue and follow through.

The Centre has decided to transfer funds amounting to Rs 2 lakh crore from the central plan and directly devolve to the state plans as central assistance.

The funding would be earmarked and used as per the guidelines framed by the Centre, but the states would also have a say to take into account local conditions, which should mean "greater authority and responsibility" for the latter in the development delivery mechanism.

However, the states do need to boost their own tax and non-tax revenues to provide greater resources for muchneeded social and physical infrastructure.

For, not doing so would veritably amount to being increasingly subject to what are really discretionary and formulaic grants and transfers decided by non-elected mavens. It points to the pressing need for the states to be much more proactive when it comes to fast-forwarding indirect tax reforms, namely, a comprehensive goods and services tax, so as to further rev up tax revenues in the states.

The change over to a value-added tax regime in the past decade did shore up consumption taxes on sales for the states. But the revenue upside going forward can be massive. Historically, the separation of taxes on production or central excise, and those on sales meant much cascading of the tax rates and a high-tax regime, effectively crowding out state taxes by evasion and other means.

There is also the need for the states to raise non-tax revenues, by levying proper user charges. And the latest figures suggest that while the tax ratio for higher-income states such as Karnataka and Tamil Nadu remains high, Gujarat is a laggard, with its own tax effort lower than that for Madhya Pradesh and even Uttar Pradesh.

The fact of the matter is that the game plan envisioned in the Interim Budget is to boost economic efficiency with greater decentralisation when it comes to intergovernmental transfers. And India's federal fiscal arrangements do mandate multiple channels for Centre-state transfers, including via Finance Commissions, the Planning Commission and various central ministries as well.

The Constitution does, after all, provide much greater powers of taxation and levies to the Centre, and a long list of spending and expenditure commitments for the states, including public order, health, education, transportation, agriculture and the like. Hence the vital need for what's termed "vertical fiscal transfers" to the states to correct the imbalance.

Yet, centrally sponsored schemes, now proposed to be labelled as central assistance in state plans, are no more than grants by various ministries to their counterparts in the states for various specified programmes. And grants and transfers can be rather discretionary. The Planning Commission does allocate grants for implementing the five-year development plans, which are now of an indicative nature rather than the top-down statist approach followed in the days of pre-reform right up to the 1990s.

But the transfers are formulaic indeed, with discretion exercised by what is a non-elected specialised body albeit set up by an Act of Parliament. The Constitution does provide for the setting up of an expert Finance Commission every five years for deciding on the share of the states in central taxes and provision for other grants, by what are deemed clear-cut objective criteria and based on the facts on the ground. But, here again, the weights assigned to the various parameters can be quite discretionary.

For instance, the weight for state population to decide on the devolution can change from 10 per cent to 25 per cent from one Finance Commission to the very next. Also, that for "index of infrastructure" can go down from 7.5 per cent to nil. Or, that for state income levels can drop from 62.5 per cent to no more than 50 per cent.

Broadly speaking, while the Finance Commission allocates about two-thirds of the transfers, the Plan panel and the ministries between them provide for about one-third.

The bottom line is that the states need to step up their own tax and nontax revenues to purposefully augment resources for their development and growth.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Quality Assurance Services Testing and Re-testing

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions