sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza
 
 
Popular Search: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: form 3cd :: VAT Audit :: TDS :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: cpt :: VAT RATES :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: empanelment :: due date for vat payment
 
 
« From the Courts »
 Par nod to bill for High Courts in Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura
 Income Tax official gets 3-yr sentence in disproportionate assets case
 CIT vs. Sahara India Housing Corporation Ltd (Delhi High Court)
 NHRC suggests night courts to tackle overcrowding in prisons
 Courts increase, yet over 15,366 cases on hold for 21 years
 CIT vs. De Beers India Minerals Pvt Ltd (Karnataka High Court)
 CIT vs. Nalwa Sons Investment Ltd (Supreme Court)
 CIT vs. Promain Ltd (Delhi High Court)
 High Court stays recovery of income tax from CHB on Parsvnath deal
 CIT vs. Vinay Mittal (Delhi High Court)
 ACIT vs. Tulip Star Hotels Ltd (Supreme Court)

The issue of notice under s. 143 (2) is mandatory for block assessment proceedings
December, 05th 2007
ACIT vs. Aurangabad Holiday Resorts (ITAT Pune)

(i) The issue of notice under s. 143 (2) is mandatory for block assessment proceedings. If notice u/s 143 (2) is not issued, the assessment order passed u/s 158BC is not valid.
(ii) Where there is a conflict between the Special Bench of the ITAT and a non-jurisdictional High Court, the High Court decision has to be followed. Godavari Devi Saraf 119 ITR 589 (Bom) reconciled with Thana Electricity 206 ITR 727 (Bom) and followed.
(iii) Where the appeal is decided on a preliminary issue, not necessary to decide the other issues in the appeal.

Note: The Tribunal followed the decision of the Gauhati High Court in Bandana Gogoi vs. CIT 289 ITR 28 (Gau) instead of the ITAT Lucknow Special Bench in Naval Kishore vs. DCIT 87 ITD 407.

See also:Atul Glass Industries vs. DCIT (ITAT Delhi), Vin Vish Corporation vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) & Tulika Mishra vs. JCIT (ITAT Delhi).
 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2012 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Software Development Software Programming Software Engineering Custom Software Development Requirement Based Software Development Software Solutions Software Serv

Victorian Jewelry | Estate Jewelry | Handmade Jewelry | Rose Cut Diamond | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Fashion India | Fashion Garments | Fashion Shows | Fashion Designers | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions