Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: cpt :: empanelment :: form 3cd :: TDS :: VAT Audit :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: due date for vat payment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: VAT RATES :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: articles on VAT and GST in India
 
 
From the Courts »
 M/s. Telenor (India) Communications Private Limited Vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 25(1), New Delhi
  Larsen & Toubro Ltd vs. State of Jharkhand (Supreme Court)
  Nishant Construction Pvt. Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
  DIT vs. A. P. Moller Maersk AS (Supreme Court)
  Larsen & Toubro Ltd vs. State of Jharkhand (Supreme Court)
  Nishant Construction Pvt. Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
 Samson Maritime Ltd vs. CIT (Bombay High Court)
 Mother Hospital Pvt. Ltd vs. CIT (Supreme Court)
 Larsen & Toubro Ltd vs. State of Jharkhand (Supreme Court)
 Nishant Construction Pvt. Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
 Flipkart India Private Limited vs. ACIT (Karnataka High Court)

A sale-cum-lease back transaction with APSEB cannot be regarded as a 'sham' or as a 'financing tranasction'
December, 05th 2007
JCIT vs. Cable Corporation of India Ltd (ITAT Mumbai)

A sale-cum-lease back transaction with APSEB cannot be regarded as a 'sham' or as a 'financing tranasction'. The assessee-purchaser is eligible for depreciation.

Note: The judgement of the Supreme Court in Asea Brown Boveri Ltd. vs. IFCI 154 TM 512 was distinguished.

See also: Orix Auto vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai): The decision of the Supreme Court in Asea Brown Boveri vs. IFCI 154 Taxman 512 does not lay down the proposition that in all cases of lease, only the lessee shall be treated as the owner and entitiled to depreciation.
 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Wholesale Silver Jewelry

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions