sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Latest Expert Exchange
From the Courts »
 M/s A Daga Royal Arts vs. ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
 Gagan Infraenergy Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
 PCIT vs. Chawla Interbild Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd (Bombay High Court)
 All India Federation of Tax Practitioners vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
  Suresh M. Jamkhindikar vs. ACIT (Bombay High Court)
  Suresh M. Jamkhindikar vs. ACIT (Bombay High Court)
 Mangammal @ Thulasi vs. T.B. Raju (Supreme Court)
 Mahabir Industries vs. PCIT (Supreme Court)
  Oriental Bank Of Commerce Vs. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax
  Suresh M. Jamkhindikar vs. ACIT (Bombay High Court)
  Union of India vs. Pirthwi Singh (Supreme Court)

Smt. Anjali Tomar, A-29, Shastri Nagar, Meerut Vs. Income-tax Officer, Ward 1(1), Meerut.
November, 23rd 2015
                                                                   ITA 5539/Del/2015

                  DELHI BENCH "C" NEW DELHI


                         ITA no. 5539 /Del/2015
                         Asstt. Yrs: 2009-10
Smt. Anjali Tomar,                    Vs. Income-tax Officer,
A-29, Shastri Nagar,                       Ward 1(1), Meerut.
( Appellant )                                 (Respondent)

      Appellant by  :          None
      Respondent by :          Shri Yatendra Singh Sr. DR

                   Date of hearing    :       17/11/2015.
                   Date of order      :       20/11/2015.



      This appeal, by the assessee, is directed against the order dated 28/03/2014,
passed by the CIT(A), Meerut, for A.Y. 2009-10.

2.    None put in appearance on behalf of the assessee at the hearing despite issue
of notice for hearing, through registered post at the address furnished by the
assessee in column 10 of the memo of appeal in form no. 36. The envelope,
containing the notice of hearing has not been returned unserved. It can, therefore,
safely be presumed that the assessee has been served with the notice of hearing. No
application for adjournment of hearing has been received on behalf of the assessee.
2 ITA 5539/Del/2015 It gives an impression that assessee is not interested in pursuing its appeal. Considering the facts of the case and keeping in view the provisions of rule 19(2) of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Rules as were considered in the case of CIT vs. Multiplan India Ltd., (38 ITD 320)(Del), the assessee's appeal is liable to be dismissed for want of prosecution. 3. The Hon'ble Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT (223 ITR 480) has held as under: "if the party, at whose instance the reference is made, fails 'to appear at the hearing, or fails in taking steps for preparation of the paper books so as to enable hearing of the reference, the court is not bound to answer the reference. " 4. Similarly, Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of New Diwan Oil Mills vs. CIT (2008) 296 ITR 495) returned the reference unanswered since the assessee remained absent and there was not any assistance from the assessee. 5. Their Lordships of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. B. Bhattachargee & Another (118 ITR 461 at page 477-478) held that the appeal does not mean, mere filing of the memo of appeal but effectively pursuing the same.
3 ITA 5539/Del/2015 6. Respectfully following the view taken in the cases cited supra, we dismiss the appeal for non-prosecution. Before parting, we add that in case the assessee is serious in pursuing the appeal filed, then it would be at liberty to pray for a recall of this order by moving an appropriate petition and also by taking appropriate action to correct the defects pointed out. The Co- ordinate Bench considering the petition if so moved, if so satisfied with the explanation and the actions of curing the defects may recall this order. The said order was pronounced in the open Court in the presence of the parties. 7. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed. Order pronounced in open court on 20/11/2015. Sd/- Sd/- ( DIVA SINGH ) (O.P. KANT) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated: 20/11/2015. *MP* Copy of order to: 1. Assessee 2. AO 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR, ITAT, New Delhi. 4 ITA 5539/Del/2015 -+ Date Initial 1. Draft dictated on 18-11.2015 PS 2. Draft placed before author 18.11.2015 PS 3. Draft proposed & placed before the second JM/AM member 4. Draft discussed/approved by Second Member. JM/AM 5. Approved Draft comes to the Sr.PS/PS PS/PS 6. Kept for pronouncement on PS 7. File sent to the Bench Clerk PS 8. Date on which file goes to the AR 9. Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk. 10. Date of dispatch of Order.
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Contact Us

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions