Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link:
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Popular Search: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: empanelment :: cpt :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: VAT RATES :: due date for vat payment :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: VAT Audit :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: form 3cd :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: TDS
From the Courts »
 Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 Vs. Pavitra Commercial Ltd.
 Commissioner Of Income Tax Delhi Iv Vs. Gee Kay Finance & Leasing Co. Ltd.
 Pr.Commissioner Of Income Tax-6 Vs. Nokia Solutions & Network India Pvt Ltd (Formerly Known As, Nokia Siemens Network Pvt Ltd)
 SKY Light Hospitality Llp Vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle -28(1), New Delhi
 Tax outgo may rise for investors in companies undergoing M&A cases
 Rajat B Mehta vs. ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
 Seema Sabharwal vs. ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
  Vikram Singh vs. UOI (Delhi High Court)
 Pr CIT vs. Shree Gopal Housing & Plantation Corporation (Bombay High Court)
 Kudrat Sandhu vs. UOI (Supreme Court)
  Vikram Singh vs. UOI (Delhi High Court)

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-3, Vardaan, Lower Ground floor, MIDC, Wagle Indl. Estate, Thane Vs. Shri Vasudevan Rangarajan, Sharanagati, 20, Shreesh CHS Ltd, Hajuri Darga Road, Thane-400604.
November, 21st 2015
                ,   "" 


                  ./I.T.A. No.2902/Mum/2012
               (   / Assessment Year:2007-2008)

 Assistant Commissioner of       / Shri Vasudevan Rangarajan,
 Income Tax, Circle-3,           Vs.
 Vardaan,                            20, Shreesh CHS Ltd,
                                      Hajuri Darga Road,
 Lower Ground floor,                 Thane-400604.
 MIDC, Wagle Indl. Estate,
       ( /Appellant)              ..    ( / Respondent)

        ./   ./PAN. :AAABPV2385A

            / Revenue by                Shri A K Dhondial
            /Assessee by                None

           / Date of Hearing                   :17.11.2015
           /Date of Pronouncement:17.11.2015

                               / O R D E R
Per B R Baskaran, AM:

       The appeal filed by the revenue is directed against the order dated
24.1.2012 passed by the Ld CIT(A)-1, Thane and it relates to the
assessment year 2007-08.

2.     The penalty of Rs.8,64,300/- levied by the AO under section
271(1)(c) of the Income Tax act, 1961, having been deleted by the ld.
CIT(A), the Revenue has filed this appeal before us.
                                      2                 I T A N o . 2 9 0 2 / Mu m / 2 0 1 2

3.    None appeared on behalf of the assessee even though the notices
were issued by RPAD on several occasions. Hence, we proceed to dispose
of the appeal ex-parte, without the presence of the assessee.

4.    We heard the ld. DR and perused the record. The assessee has
derived salary income from M/s ACC Ltd. During the year under
consideration, the assessee suffered a loss of Rs.25,24,716/- from share
trading activities.   In the return of income, the assessee set off of share
trading loss against the salary income and accordingly computed the total
income.    It is pertinent to note that the Income tax provisions do not
permit set off of share trading loss against salary income. However, in the
assessment proceedings, the assessee accepted the mistake in claiming
set off of loss from share trading activity against salary income.
Accordingly, the AO completed the assessment disallowing the set off
claimed by the assessee. The AO levied penalty of Rs.8,64,300/- by
holding that the assessee has furnished inaccurate particulars of income by
claiming set off of loss suffered in share trading activities against the
salary income. The ld. CIT(A), however, deleted the addition by following
the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court rendered in the case of CIT
vs. Reliance Petro products (2010) 322 ITR 158 (SC).

5.    The ld. DR submitted that the decision rendered by the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in the case of Reliance Petroproduct (supra) is not
applicable to the facts of the present case. He submitted that the decision
rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Reliance
Petroproudct (supra) shall be applicable in respect of deductions which are
not sustainable in law.     He submitted that the assessee, in the instant
case, has claimed set off share trading loss against the salary income
                                     3                  I T A N o . 2 9 0 2 / Mu m / 2 0 1 2

which is not permissible under the provisions of Income Tax Act. Further,
he has availed services of Chartered Accountant for filing return of income
and hence the assessee has deliberately furnished inaccurate particulars of

6.     We find merit in the contentions of the ld.DR that the decision
rendered in the case of Reliance petro products Ltd (supra) may not be
applicable to the facts of the present case. We have noticed that the Ld
CIT(A) has granted relief by following the said decision.      Accordingly, we
are of the view that the decision has been rendered by the ld.CIT(A) under
incorrect appreciation of law. Accordingly, we are of the view that this
issue requires fresh examination at the end of the ld.CIT(A). Accordingly,
we set aside the order of ld.CIT(A) and restore the matter to his file with a
direction to adjudicate the same afresh after providing necessary
opportunity of being heard to the assessee.

7.     In the result, the appeal of the revenue is allowed for statistical

       Pronounced accordingly on 17th November, 2015.

             17th Nov, 2015    

        Sd                                            sd
      (PAWAN SINGH)                              ( B.R. BASKARAN)
     JUDICIAL MEMBER                               ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

 Mumbai:17th Nov, 2015.
.../ SRL , Sr. PS
                          4              I T A N o . 2 9 0 2 / Mu m / 2 0 1 2

    /Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1.  / The Appellant
2.    / The Respondent.
3.     () / The CIT(A)- concerned
4.      / CIT concerned
5.    ,   ,                      /
     DR, ITAT, Mumbai concerned
6.     / Guard file.

                                            / BY ORDER,
True copy
                                       (Asstt. Registrar)
                                ,  /ITAT, Mumbai
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Organic SEO Outsourcing Organic Search Engine Optimization Outsourcing Organic Website SEO Organic SEO India Website SEO India Organic Search Engine Optimization India Organic Internet SEO India Organic Web

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions