News shortcuts: From the Courts | Top Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | Professional Updates | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
« From the Courts »
 Excess ITC has to be Refunded back to Dealer, can’t be carried Forward for Adjustment of Future Tax Liability: Madras HC
 Dy. CIT, Central Circle-29, New Delhi. Vs. M/s. S.R. Credits Pvt. Ltd. 4828-29/24, 1st Floor, Prahlad Lane, Ansari Road, Daryaganj, Delhi
 Urmilla Ghanshyam Dass Ghiraiya A-21, First Floor, Lok Vihar, Pitampura Delhi Vs. ACIT Central Circle, Karnal
 Shri Surat Singh, VPO Bhapra, Samhalka, vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward : 4, Panipat.
 Dy. CIT, Central Circle-29, New Delhi. Vs. M/s. S.R. Credits Pvt. Ltd. 4, 1st Floor, Prahlad Lane, Ansari Road, Daryaganj, Delhi
 SC directs DRT to Transmit Rent received from Property attached to the Amrapali Account
 Vardhman Automobiles (P.) Ltd., Opposite Air Force School, Old Delhi Road, Gurgaon- Vs. The ITO, TDS Ward, Gurgaon.
 M/s. Sheela Foam Ltd., (Foprmerly known as Sheela Foam Pvt.Ltd.), 37/2, Site-IV, Sahibabad Industrial Area, Ghaziabad. Vs. The ACIT, Central Circle-06, New Delhi.
 ACIT, Central Circle-8, New Delhi Vs Sh. Sohan Singh Dhingra (HUF), 85, Golf Links, New Delhi
 Manoj Kumar Jain C/o. O.P. Sapra & Associates C-763, New Friends Colony New Delhi Vs. DCIT Central Circle Income Tax Office, 3rd Floor, CGO Complex -1, Hapur Road, Ghaziabad
 M/s Sheela Foam Ltd. C-55, Preet Vihar, Vikas Marg, New Delhi Vs The DCIT, Central Circle-6, New Delhi.

The Income Tax Officer, Ward-14(3), Room No.305, C.R. Building, New Delhi. Vs. M/s. KEI Industries Ltd., D-90, Okhla Industrial Area, Phase-I, New Delhi.
October, 22nd 2019
               DELHI BENCHES "D": DELHI


                Assessment Year 2011-2012

The Income Tax Officer,          M/s. KEI Industries Ltd.,
Ward-14(3),                      D-90, Okhla Industrial
Room No.305, C.R.           vs., Area, Phase-I, New Delhi.
Building, New Delhi.             PAN AAACK0251C
        (Appellant)                     (Respondent)

                              Shri Satish Kumar Gupta,
               For Revenue :                    Sr. D.R.
                              Shri Satyen Sethi, And
               For Assessee :
                              Shri A.T. Panda, Advocates.

             Date of Hearing : 21.10.2019
      Date of Pronouncement : 21.10.2019



           This appeal by Revenue has been directed against

the Order of the Ld. CIT(A)-V, New Delhi, Dated 30.03.2015,

for the A.Y. 2011-2012.

2.         Admittedly, the tax effect in the Departmental

Appeal is less than Rs.50 lakhs. Vide Circular No.3/2018
                                          M/s. KEI Industries Ltd., New Delhi.

Dated 11th July, 2018 issued by CBDT under section 268A

of the I.T. Act, it has been directed that the Department

shall not file appeal before the Tribunal in case where the

tax effect does not exceed the monetary limit of Rs.20 lakhs.

It   is   also   directed   that   this    instruction        will    apply

retrospectively to pending appeals and appeals to be filed

henceforth in the Tribunal. Pending appeals below the

specified tax limit may be withdrawn/not pressed by the

Department. The CBDT Vide Circular No.17/2019 Dated

08.08.2019 amended the earlier Circular No.3/2018 (supra)

whereby it has been directed that monetary limit for filing

the Departmental appeal in Income Tax Cases may be

enhanced further through this amendment in para-3 of the

Circular mentioned above and accordingly, the monetary

limit for filing the appeal before the Appellate Tribunal have

been enhanced to Rs.50 lakhs. Since Circular No.17/2019

Dated 08.08.2019 have been issued to amend its earlier

Circular No.3/2018 (supra), therefore, all the conditions of

earlier Circular No.3/2018 shall apply accordingly.
                                       M/s. KEI Industries Ltd., New Delhi.

3.           The Ld. D.R. in view of the above Board's

Circulars did not press the Departmental Appeal. The case

of the Department would not fall in the exceptions provided

in   the    above   Board     Circulars.    In    the     result,     the

Departmental appeal is not maintainable as the appeal is

filed against the Board instructions referred to above and

therefore, the appeal of the Department is liable to be


4.           In   the   result,   appeal    of    the     Department


             Order pronounced in the open Court.

    Sd/-                                     Sd/-
   (B.R.R. KUMAR)                           (BHAVNESH SAINI)
Delhi, Dated 21st October, 2019
Copy to
1.   The appellant
2.   The respondent
3.   CIT(A) concerned
4.   CIT concerned
5.   D.R. ITAT "D" Bench
6.   Guard File
                       // BY Order //

           Asst. Registrar : ITAT Delhi Benches : Delhi.
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2020 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting