Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Karnataka High Court restrains Bengaluru-based Institute of Chartered Tax Practitioners India from enrolling candidates for its courses
 Attachment on Cash Credit of Assessee under GST Act: Delhi HC directs Bank to Comply Instructions to Vacate
 Income Tax Addition Made Towards Unsubstantiated Share Capital Is Eligible For Section 80-IC Deduction: Delhi High Court
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court
 Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger
 Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court

Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-32, New Delhi vs. M/s Utkarsh Realtech Pvt. Ltd. M-11,Middle Circle, Connaught Circus, New Delhi
October, 22nd 2019
             IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                  (DELHI BENCH: `E': NEW DELHI)

            BEFORE SHRI SUSHMA CHOWLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER
                              AND
            SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

                         ITA No:- 4797/Del/2015
                       (Assessment Year: 2011-12)

   Dy.     Commissioner    of    M/s Utkarsh Realtech Pvt. Ltd.
   Income      Tax,   Central Vs M-11,Middle Circle, Connaught
   Circle-32, New Delhi          Circus, New Delhi

                                      PAN-AABCU0945J
   APPELLANT                          RESPONDENT
   Appellant by       Ms. Rakhi Bimal, Sr. DR
   Respondent by      None

                                 ORDER

PER ANADEE NATH MISSHRA, AM

[A].   This appeal has been filed by the Revenue against the order dated

27.03.2015 passed by Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-

XXX, New Delhi [in short "Ld. CIT(A)"] pertaining to assessment year

2011-12. In this appeal, the tax effect is less than the monetary limit

fixed by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (in short "CBDT") in its

Circular No.17/2009 dated 08.08.2019. The Revenue has raised

following grounds of appeal:-







       1.    On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld.

       CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in holding that the interest is
                                                          ITA No: - 4797/Del/2015



       paid and received only on the extension of PDCs and not for the

       entire period of PDCs.


       2.    On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law,

       the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in giving directions that interest on PDCs is

       to be calculated after six months of issue of PDCs i.e. date of sale.


       3.    On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law,

       the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in not considering the relevant seized

       material while deciding the issue of interest on PDCs.


       4.    The order of the CIT(A) is erroneous and is not tenable on facts

       and in law.


[B].   At the outset, it was brought to the notice by us, at the time of

hearing that tax effect in this appeal is below Rs. 50,00,000./-. Vide

recent CBDT Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 read with earlier

CBDT Circular No. 3 of 2018, dated 11.07.2018, minimum threshold

limit of tax effect of filing of appeals by Revenue in Income Tax Appellate

Tribunal ("ITAT", for short) has been enhanced to Rs. 50,00,000/-. In a

subsequent clarification issued by CBDT vide F.No. 279/Misc/M-

93/2018-ITJ, dated 20/08/2019, it has been clarified by CBDT that the

aforesaid revised monetary limit is also applicable to all pending appeals

in ITAT. Therefore, in view of the foregoing, we are of the view that this

appeal filed by Revenue is not maintainable. Accordingly this appeal is

dismissed being not maintainable, having regard to aforesaid CBDT
                                                                         Page | 2
                                                     ITA No: - 4797/Del/2015








Circular No. 17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 read with aforesaid CBDT

Circular No. 3 of 2018 in the light of aforesaid clarification dated

20/08/2019.


[C]. Before leaving, we clarify that Revenue will be at liberty to

approach Income Tax Appellate Tribunal U/s 254(2) of Income Tax

Act, 1961 seeking recall of this order and, for restoration of the

appeal if it is found that this appeal of Revenue        is not covered

by aforesaid CBDT Circulars dated 08.08.2019 and 11.07.2018.


[D].   In the result, the appeal by Revenue is dismissed. Our decision

was orally pronounced in the Open Court after conclusion of hearing on

the date of hearing. Now, this written order is pronounced in Open Court

on 22.10.2019.



       Sd/-                                         Sd/-
  (SUSHMA CHOWLA)                           (ANADEE NATH MISSHRA)
  JUDICIAL MEMBER                             ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Dated: 22.10.2019
SH

Copy   forwarded to:
  1.    Appellant
  2.    Respondent
  3.    CIT
  4.    CIT(Appeals)
  5.    DR: ITAT


                                                ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
                                                      ITAT NEW DELHI


                                                                    Page | 3

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2025 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting