Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Attachment on Cash Credit of Assessee under GST Act: Delhi HC directs Bank to Comply Instructions to Vacate
 Income Tax Addition Made Towards Unsubstantiated Share Capital Is Eligible For Section 80-IC Deduction: Delhi High Court

Rohit Gupta, C/o Pram Prakash, 183/2, North Civil Lines,Vs. Ito, Ward 1(5), Advocate, Shamli-24776
October, 25th 2018
               IN THE INCOME TAX APPELATE TRIBUNAL

                   DELHI BENCH "SMC": NEW DELHI

             BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER


                      ITA No. 3114/DEL/2018
                           A.Y.: 2010-11

ROHIT GUPTA,                             VS.   ITO, WARD 1(5),
C/O PRAM PRAKASH, ADVOCATE,                    SHAMLI-24776
183/2, NORTH CIVIL LINES,
MUZAFFARNAGAR-251006
 (PAN: AGIPA8063D)
(Appellant)                             (Respondent)

                Assessee by  : None
                Department by : SH. PRADEEP KUMAR MEEL, SR. DR.

                                ORDER
PER H.S. SIDHU, JM


     This appeal filed by the Assessee is directed against the Order
dated 28.2.2018 of the Ld. CIT(A), Muzaffarnagar relevant to
assessment year 2010-11.
2.   In this case the Notice was sent to the assessee for hearing for
today i.e. 24.10.2018 at the address mentioned in Form No. 36 vide
Column No. 10.
3. On 24.10.2018, neither the assessee nor his Authorised Representative attended the hearing and also not filed any Application for adjournment or nor filed the fresh address before the Tribunal, hence, I am of the view that no useful purpose would be served to serve the notice again and again on the same address. In view of above, it is thus inferred that the assessee is not interested in prosecution of his Appeal. 4. Having regard to Rule 19(2) of ITAT Rules and following various decisions of Delhi Bench of the Tribunal including that of Multiplan India Ltd. : 38 ITD 320 (Delhi) and Hon'ble Madhya Pradesh High Court's decision in Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT; 223 ITR Page 1 of 3 480 (MP), I treat this appeal as unadmitted and dismiss the same. I would like to clarify that subsequently if the assessee explains the reasons for non appearance and if the Bench is so satisfied, the matter may be recalled for the purpose of adjudication of the Appeal. 5. In the result, the Appeal of the assessee is dismissed in limine. Order pronounced on 24-10-2018. Sd/- [H.S. SIDHU] JUDICIAL MEMBER Date:24/10/2018 SRBhatnagar Copy forwarded to: - 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4.CIT (A) 5. DR, ITAT TRUE COPY By Order, Assistant Registrar, ITAT, Delhi Benches Page 2 of 3 Page 3 of 3
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting