Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court
 Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger
 Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court
 Delhi High Court Seeks Status Report from Centre for Appointments of Chairperson & Members in Adjudicating Authority Under PMLA
 Delhi High Court allows Income Tax Exemption to Charitable Society running Printing Press and uses Profit so generated for Charitable Purposes
 ITAT accepts Lease Income as Business Income as Business Investments were mostly in nature of Properties

Ram Niwas, S/o Sh. Ramphal, VPO Parnala Tehsilbhadurgarh Distt. Vs. Ito, Ward-4 Rohtak
October, 25th 2018
               IN THE INCOME TAX APPELATE TRIBUNAL

                   DELHI BENCH "SMC": NEW DELHI

             BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER


                      ITA No. 3233/DEL/2018
                           A.Y.: 2006-07

RAM NIWAS,                 VS.    ITO, WARD-4
S/O SH. RAMPHAL,                  ROHTAK
VPO PARNALA TEHSIL
BHADURGARH DISTT.
JAJHAR
(PAN: AOIPR9456D)
(Appellant)                               (Respondent)

                Assessee by  : None
                Department by : SH. PRADEEP KUMAR MEEL, SR. DR.

                                  ORDER
PER H.S. SIDHU, JM


     This appeal filed by the Assessee is directed against the Order
dated 19.4.2016 of the Ld. CIT(A), Rohtak relevant to assessment
year 2006-07.
2. In this case the Notice was sent to the assessee for hearing for today i.e. 24.10.2018 at the address mentioned in Form No. 36 vide Column No. 10. 3. On 24.10.2018, neither the assessee nor his Authorised Representative attended the hearing and also not filed any Application for adjournment or nor filed the fresh address before the Tribunal, hence, I am of the view that no useful purpose would be served to serve the notice again and again on the same address. In view of above, it is thus inferred that the assessee is not interested in prosecution of his Appeal. 4. Having regard to Rule 19(2) of ITAT Rules and following various decisions of Delhi Bench of the Tribunal including that of Multiplan India Ltd. : 38 ITD 320 (Delhi) and Hon'ble Madhya Pradesh High Page 1 of 2 Court's decision in Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT; 223 ITR 480 (MP), I treat this appeal as unadmitted and dismiss the same. I would like to clarify that subsequently if the assessee explains the reasons for non appearance and if the Bench is so satisfied, the matter may be recalled for the purpose of adjudication of the Appeal. 5. In the result, the Appeal of the assessee is dismissed in limine. Order pronounced on 24-10-2018. Sd/- [H.S. SIDHU] JUDICIAL MEMBER Date:24/10/2018 SRBhatnagar Copy forwarded to: - 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4.CIT (A) 5. DR, ITAT TRUE COPY By Order, Assistant Registrar, ITAT, Delhi Benches Page 2 of 2
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting