Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: empanelment :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: VAT RATES :: VAT Audit :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: TDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: form 3cd :: cpt :: due date for vat payment :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT
 
 
From the Courts »
 Ravneet Takhar Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax Ix And Ors.
 Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax
 Formula One World Championship Limited Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax, International Taxation-3 And Anr.
 Commissioner Of Income Tax International Taxation-3 Delhi Vs. Formula One World Championship Ltd. And Anr.
 Reliance Communications Ltd vs. DDIT (ITAT Mumbai)
  Sushila Devi vs. CIT (Delhi High Court)
 Ashok Prapann Sharma vs. CIT (Supreme Court)a
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
  Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
 M.K.Overseas Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Pr.Commissioner Of Income Tax-06
 Arshia Ahmed Qureshi Vs. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-21

Shri Tejraj D. Kothari Shop No. 3, Shiv Baug Daftary Road, Malad (E) Mumbai 400097 Vs. D C I T 24(2) Bandra Kurla Complex Bandra (E), Mumbai 400051
October, 06th 2015
           IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                    "SMC" Bench, Mumbai

            Before Shri D. Manmohan, Vice President

                    ITA No. 3257/Mum/2014
                    (Assessment Year: 2007-08)

     Shri Tejraj D. Kothari         D C I T 24(2)
     Shop No. 3, Shiv Baug          Bandra Kurla Complex
                                Vs.
     Daftary Road, Malad (E)        Bandra (E), Mumbai 400051
     Mumbai 400097
                           PAN - AABPK8519P
            Appellant                       Respondent

                  Appellant by:  None
                  Respondent by: Shri K. Ravikiran

                  Date of Hearing:       05.10.2015
                  Date of Pronouncement: 10.10.2015

                             ORDER

Per D. Manmohan, V.P.

     This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order passed
by CIT(A)-34, Mumbai and it pertains to A.Y. 2007-08.

2.    The case was adjourned from time to time at the request of the
assessee but today none appeared on behalf of the assessee. I
therefore proceed to dispose of the appeal exparte, qua the assessee.




3.    At the outset it may be noticed that the order of the CIT(A) was
communicated to the assessee on 26.06.2012. The assessee ought to
have filed an appeal on or before 25.08.2012 whereas appeal papers
were filed in the Registry on 07.05.2014 resulting in a delay of 620
days. Though in the acknowledgement-cum-notice the Registry
intimated the fact that the appeal was time barred by 620 days, till
date the assessee has not filed any affidavit/petition for condonation
of delay. In fact there was some minor delay in filing the appeal
before the CIT(A), as could be noticed from Form No. 35, but the
CIT(A) has overlooked the fact and proceeded to dispose of the
                                     2              ITA No. 3257/Mum/2014
                                                       Shri Tejraj D. Kothari

appeal despite a petition by the assessee for seeking condonation of
delay. At any rate, at this stage since there was substantial delay and
the assessee having not furnished any reason for the substantial
delay, I am unable to admit the appeal.

4.        In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as
unadmitted on the ground that it is barred by limitation.




Order pronounced in the open court on 5th October, 2015.

                                                      Sd/-
                                                (D. Manmohan)
                                                 Vice President

Mumbai, Dated: 5th October, 2015

Copy to:

     1.   The   Appellant
     2.   The   Respondent
     3.   The   CIT(A) ­ 34, Mumbai
     4.   The   CIT­ 24, Mumbai City
     5.   The   DR, "SMC" Bench, ITAT, Mumbai
                                                        By Order

//True Copy//
                                                 Assistant Registrar
                                         ITAT, Mumbai Benches, Mumbai

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Custom Software Development Outsourcing Custom Software Development Offshore Cus

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions