Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link:
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Popular Search: articles on VAT and GST in India :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: VAT RATES :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: TDS :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: due date for vat payment :: form 3cd :: empanelment :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: cpt :: VAT Audit
From the Courts »
 M/S Abhipra Capital Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (Investigation)
 Rashtriya Chemicals & Fertilizers Limited vs. CIT (ITAT Mumbai)
  Abicor and Binzel Technoweld Pvt. Ltd vs. UOI (Bombay High Court)
 Abicor and Binzel Technoweld Pvt. Ltd vs. UOI (Bombay High Court)
 CST vs. Shri Krishna Chaitanya Enterprises (Bombay High Court)
 Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation (Gwalior) M.P. Ltd vs. CIT (Supreme Court)
 Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 Vs. Pavitra Commercial Ltd.
 Commissioner Of Income Tax Delhi Iv Vs. Gee Kay Finance & Leasing Co. Ltd.
 Pr.Commissioner Of Income Tax-6 Vs. Nokia Solutions & Network India Pvt Ltd (Formerly Known As, Nokia Siemens Network Pvt Ltd)
 SKY Light Hospitality Llp Vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle -28(1), New Delhi
 Tax outgo may rise for investors in companies undergoing M&A cases

Shri Tejraj D. Kothari Shop No. 3, Shiv Baug Daftary Road, Malad (E) Mumbai 400097 Vs. D C I T 24(2) Bandra Kurla Complex Bandra (E), Mumbai 400051
October, 06th 2015
                    "SMC" Bench, Mumbai

            Before Shri D. Manmohan, Vice President

                    ITA No. 3257/Mum/2014
                    (Assessment Year: 2007-08)

     Shri Tejraj D. Kothari         D C I T 24(2)
     Shop No. 3, Shiv Baug          Bandra Kurla Complex
     Daftary Road, Malad (E)        Bandra (E), Mumbai 400051
     Mumbai 400097
                           PAN - AABPK8519P
            Appellant                       Respondent

                  Appellant by:  None
                  Respondent by: Shri K. Ravikiran

                  Date of Hearing:       05.10.2015
                  Date of Pronouncement: 10.10.2015


Per D. Manmohan, V.P.

     This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order passed
by CIT(A)-34, Mumbai and it pertains to A.Y. 2007-08.

2.    The case was adjourned from time to time at the request of the
assessee but today none appeared on behalf of the assessee. I
therefore proceed to dispose of the appeal exparte, qua the assessee.

3.    At the outset it may be noticed that the order of the CIT(A) was
communicated to the assessee on 26.06.2012. The assessee ought to
have filed an appeal on or before 25.08.2012 whereas appeal papers
were filed in the Registry on 07.05.2014 resulting in a delay of 620
days. Though in the acknowledgement-cum-notice the Registry
intimated the fact that the appeal was time barred by 620 days, till
date the assessee has not filed any affidavit/petition for condonation
of delay. In fact there was some minor delay in filing the appeal
before the CIT(A), as could be noticed from Form No. 35, but the
CIT(A) has overlooked the fact and proceeded to dispose of the
                                     2              ITA No. 3257/Mum/2014
                                                       Shri Tejraj D. Kothari

appeal despite a petition by the assessee for seeking condonation of
delay. At any rate, at this stage since there was substantial delay and
the assessee having not furnished any reason for the substantial
delay, I am unable to admit the appeal.

4.        In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as
unadmitted on the ground that it is barred by limitation.

Order pronounced in the open court on 5th October, 2015.

                                                (D. Manmohan)
                                                 Vice President

Mumbai, Dated: 5th October, 2015

Copy to:

     1.   The   Appellant
     2.   The   Respondent
     3.   The   CIT(A) ­ 34, Mumbai
     4.   The   CIT­ 24, Mumbai City
     5.   The   DR, "SMC" Bench, ITAT, Mumbai
                                                        By Order

//True Copy//
                                                 Assistant Registrar
                                         ITAT, Mumbai Benches, Mumbai
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Custom Software Development Outsourcing Custom Software Development Offshore Cus

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions