IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
"SMC" Bench, Mumbai
Before Shri D. Manmohan, Vice President
ITA No. 7152/Mum/2014
(Assessment Year: 2008-09)
Shri Lakhan Bansidhar Gupta Income Tax Officer-24(2)(4)
272, Gupta Cottage Mumbai
Vs.
Chincholi Bunder Road
Malad (W), Mumbai 400064
PAN - AKNPG5608F
Appellant Respondent
Appellant by: None
Respondent by: Shri K. Ravikiran
Date of Hearing: 05.10.2015
Date of Pronouncement: 05.10.2015
ORDER
Per D. Manmohan, V.P.
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order passed
by CIT(A)-34, Mumbai and it pertains to A.Y. 2008-09.
2. The case was last posted for hearing on 25.08.2015 but
adjourned on the ground that none appeared on behalf of the
assessee and notice was issued by RPAD to the address given in Form
No. 36. Even today none appeared on behalf of the assessee. Under
these circumstances I proceed to dispose of the appeal exparte, qua
the assessee.
3. Admittedly, there is a delay of nine days in filing the appeal but
the assessee did not choose to file any petition explaining the reasons
for the delay in filing the appeal though the assessee was informed of
the delay through the acknowledgement-cum-notice issued by the
Registry. In the absence of any justifiable cause mentioned in the
appeal papers filed by the assessee, I am of the opinion that the appeal
cannot be admitted on the ground that it is barred by limitation.
2 ITA No. 7152/Mum/2014
Shri Lakhan Bansidhar Gupta
4. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as
unadmitted.
Order pronounced in the open court on 5th October, 2015.
Sd/-
(D. Manmohan)
Vice President
Mumbai, Dated: 5th October, 2015
Copy to:
1. The Appellant
2. The Respondent
3. The CIT(A) 34, Mumbai
4. The CIT 24, Mumbai City
5. The DR, "SMC" Bench, ITAT, Mumbai
By Order
//True Copy//
Assistant Registrar
ITAT, Mumbai Benches, Mumbai
|