Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link: https://ims.go2customer.com
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft info@binarysoft.com
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: form 3cd :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: cpt :: empanelment :: TDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: VAT Audit :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: due date for vat payment :: VAT RATES :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4%
 
 
From the Courts »
 M/s Ess Distribution (Mauritius) S.N.C.Et Compagnie Vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle -1(2)(2) International Taxation, New Delhi
 Commissioner Of Income Tax (Ltu) Vs. ESPN Software India Ltd.
 Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd. Vs. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax,
 ITO vs. Gymkhana Club (ITAT Chandigarh)
 SRD Nutrients Private Limited vs. CCE (Supreme Court)
 The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Exemption Vs. The Fertilizers Association Of India
 The Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central-1 Vs. Sameer Gupta
 Msd Pharmaceuticals (P)ltd. Vs. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr.
 The Chamber Of Tax Consultants vs. UOI (Delhi High Court)
 M/s Ess Distribution (Mauritius) S.N.C.Et Compagnie Vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1(2)(2) International Taxation, New Delhi
 M/s Ess Advertising (Mauritius) S.N.C.Et Compagnie (Earlier Known As M/s Espan Star Sports Mauritius Vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1(2)(2) International Taxation, New Delhi

M/s. Multiconsult Pvt. Ltd. 303/304, Indradarshan Bldg.No.18 Next to tarapore Garden Andheri(W) Mumbai-400 053. Vs. Income tax Officer-8(2)-3 Mumbai.
October, 05th 2015
                      ,     
             INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,MUMBAI-"B",BENCH
         ,      ,   
        Before S/Sh. Rajendra,Accountant Member & Shaktijit Dey,Judicial Member
  /.ITA No.6537/Mum/2013, /Assessment Year-2007-08
        M/s. Multiconsult Pvt. Ltd.                Income tax Officer-8(2)-3
        303/304, Indradarshan Bldg.No.18           Mumbai.
        Next to tarapore Garden               Vs
        Andheri(W)
        Mumbai-400 053.
               ( /Appellant)                        (  / Respondent)
                   /Assessee by                    :Ms. Neha Paranjpe
                    / Revenue by                 :Dr. Santosh Mankuskar
                     / Date of Hearing                        : 01 - 10 -2015
                      / Date of Pronouncement                  : 01 -10-2015
                    , 1961   254(1)     
                   Order u/s.254(1)of the Inco me-tax Act,1961(Act)
      PER RAJENDRA, AM-
Challenging the order dated 11.09.2013 of CIT(A)-17,Mumbai,the Assessee has raised following
grounds of appeal:

      "1.The ld. CIT(A) erred in confrming the levy of penalty u/s.271(1)(c) of Rs.2,84,070/-
      Your appellants crave leave to add, to alter or to amend any or all of the above grounds of
      appeal."
Brief Facts:
2.The effective ground of appeal is about deletion of penalty imposed u/s.271(1)(c)of the Act.
The assessee had filed its return of income on 27.03.2008,declaring income of Rs.4.31 lakhs.The
Assessing Officer(AO)completed the assessment on 24.12.2009,u/s.143(3)of the Act, enhancing
the income of the assessee by Rs.17.60 lakhs.




3.During the assessment proceedings the AO found that the assessee had changed its method of
accounting.He held that the change was not bonafide and was a colourable device to evade tax
and suppression of income of Rs.10.95 lakhs.He added the said amount to the income of the
assessee and initiated penalty proceedings against the u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act.In the appellate
proceedings,the First Appellate Authority(FAA)upheld the order of the AO. After the order of
the FAA,the AO gave an opportunity to the assessee to explain as to why the penalty should not
be levied.As per the AO,the assessee did not file any explanation in that regard.Therfore,he
imposed a penalty of Rs.2.84 lakhs for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income.The assessee
agitated the matter before the FAA,but he dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee and
confirmed the penalty order.In the meanwhile,the assessee challenged the order of the FAA
before the Tribunal.Vide its order,dated 21.5.2014(ITA/3517/Mum/2011),the appeal filed by the
assessee was allowed and the order of the FAA was reversed by the Tribunal.

4.Before us,the Authorised Representative(AR)argued that the Tribunal had deleted the addition
made by the AO and confirmed by the FAA.Departmental Representative(DR)left the issue to

                                               1
                                                                               6537/13Multiconsult-A.Y.07-08






the discretion of the Bench.We find that the quantum addition,which was the basis for imposing
concealment penalty,has been deleted by the Tribunal.Therefore,the order of the FAA confirm -
ing the penalty imposed by the AO,amounting to Rs.2.84 lakhs would not survive.Reversing the
his order,we decide effective ground of appeal in favour of the assessee.

                  As a result,appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed.
                            
         Order pronounced in the open court on 1st October,2015.
                   01.   2015    

                   Sd/-                                                 Sd/-
       (   / Shaktijit Dey)                                    ( / RAJENDRA)
         / JUDICIAL MEMBER                                     / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
/Mumbai, /Date: 01 .10.2015
...Jv.Sr.PS.
     /Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1.Appellant /                             2. Respondent / 
3.The concerned CIT(A)/    , 4.The concerned CIT /  
5.DR " B" Bench, ITAT, Mumbai / ,  ,.. .
6.Guard File/ 
                                //True Copy//
                                             / BY ORDER,
                                     /  Dy./Asst. Registrar
                                  ,  /ITAT, Mumbai.




                                                2

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Achievements

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions