Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
Popular Search: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: empanelment :: TDS :: VAT RATES :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: VAT Audit :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: form 3cd :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: due date for vat payment :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: cpt :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4%
From the Courts »
 Group M. Media India Pvt. Ltd vs. UOI (Bombay High Court)
 Shreemati Devi vs. CIT (Allahabad High Court)
 Vatsala Shenoy vs. JCIT (Supreme Court)
  Dr. Gautam Sen vs. CCIT (Bombay High Court)
 Dr. Gautam Sen vs. CCIT (Bombay High Court)
 DCIT vs. Shivshankar R. Sharma (ITAT Mumbai)
 ACIT vs. Jawaharlal Agicha (ITAT Mumbai)
 CIT vs. M/s. D. Chetan & Co (Bombay High Court)
 Makes further amendments to Notification no. 157/90-Customs dated 28th March, 1990 regarding temporary admission under the ATA Carnet
 Appointment of Common Adjudicating Authority by DGRI - 2/2016-Customs

M/s India Petroleum C-140, 1st Floor, Defense Colony, New Delhi-110024 Vs. DCIT, Central Circle-07 (erstwhile DCIT CC-12), New Delhi
October, 05th 2015
                    Before Sh. N. K. Saini, AM
           ITA No. 4734/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06
           ITA No. 4735/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06
M/s India Petroleum             Vs DCIT, Central Circle-07
C-140, 1 Floor, Defense Colony,    (erstwhile DCIT CC-12),
New Delhi-110024                    New Delhi
(APPELLANT)                        (RESPONDENT)
                 Assessee by : None
                 Revenue by : Sh. T. Vasantan, Sr. DR

Date of Hearing : 01.10.2015     Date of Pronouncement : 01.10.2015

     These two appeals by the assessee are directed against the
separate orders each dated 16.03.2015 of ld. CIT(A)-XXIV,
New Delhi.

2.   These appeals are barred by limitation by 56 days. The
Power of Attorney filed by the assessee is also defective as the
same is without stamp fee. Earlier these cases were fixed for
hearing on 27.08.2015 and adjourned for today i.e. 01.10.2015
as nobody was present on the said date. Today also when the
cases were called for hearing nobody was present on behalf of
the assessee neither any adjournment was sought. It, therefore,
                                     2             ITA Nos. 4734 & 4735/Del/2015
                                                             India Petroleum

appears that the assessee is not interested to prosecute the

3.    The law aids those who are vigilant, not those who sleep upon their
rights.   This   principle   is   embodied    in   well    known       dictum,
"VIGILANTIBUS         ET     NON      DORMIENTIBUS            JURA        SUB
VENIUNT'. Considering the facts and keeping in view the provisions
of rule 19(2) of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Rules as were
considered in the case of CIT vs. Multiplan India Ltd., (38 ITD
320)(Del), we treat this appeal as unadmitted.

4.    Similar view has been taken by the Hon'ble Madhya Pradesh High
Court in the case of Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT (223 ITR
480) wherein it has been held as under:

      "if the party, at whose instance the reference is made, fails to
     appear at the hearing, or fails in taking steps for preparation
     of the paper books so as to enable hearing of the reference, the
     court is not bound to answer the reference."

5.    Similarly, Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of
New Diwan Oil Mills vs. CIT (2008) 296 ITR 495) returned the
reference unanswered since the assessee remained absent and there was
not any assistance from the assessee.

6.    Their Lordships of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs.
B. Bhattachargee & Another (118 ITR 461 at page 477-478) held that
                                        3             ITA Nos. 4734 & 4735/Del/2015
                                                                India Petroleum

the appeal does not mean, mere filing of the memo of appeal but
effectively pursuing the same.

7.      So by respectfully following the view taken in the cases cited
supra, I dismiss the appeal for non-prosecution.

8.       In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed.
 (Order Pronounced in the Court on 01/10/2015)

                                                (N. K. Saini)
                                            ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Dated: 01/10/2015
Copy forwarded to:
1. Appellant
2. Respondent
3. CIT
4. CIT(Appeals)
                                                      ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Our Mission

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions