Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: articles on VAT and GST in India :: due date for vat payment :: VAT Audit :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: VAT RATES :: TDS :: empanelment :: form 3cd :: cpt :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: list of goods taxed at 4%
 
 
Transfer Pricing »
 The transfer pricing conflict is about profit shifting
 Transfer Pricing Compensating Adjustments: Another IRS Loss
 HMRC steps up inquiries into cross-border deals by big business
 An Overview of Transfer Pricing in China
 South Africa: transfer pricing record-keeping rules finalized
 India among the top three nations where transfer pricing policies faced official examination: EY Survey
 Vietnam publishes draft transfer pricing law to combat tax avoidance
 New transfer pricing documentation rules and fiscal assessment procedure in Finland
 India, US resolve tax disputes worth Rs 5,000 crore via APA
 India, UK sign three Advance Pricing Agreements
  Foreign Exchange Management (Insurance) Regulations, 2015

India to tie up with G20, OECD nations to stop transfer of profits to tax havens
October, 06th 2015

India is set to make major changes in its Income Tax Act and sign a multilateral agreement with G20 and OECD nations to prevent the corporate practice of showing large parts of global profits in low tax countries and tax havens instead of the country where economic activity takes place.

The government would sign a legal instrument with nearly 90 countries as early as 2016 to counter tax avoidance strategies of corporations, including abuse of tax treaties such as the one with Mauritius. These nations would also take coordinated measures to bring digital economy under the tax net, tighten disclosures of cross-border transactions among related group firms, tax the profits held abroad without repatriation and tighten the definition of a company’s business presence in a country.

Industry experts, however, said enhanced taxation powers ought to be balanced with fair tax administration and efficient dispute resolution, considering that India has a huge backlog of tax litigation, and a history of changing tax law with retrospective effect besides making huge tax demands on cross-border transactions of MNCs.

The 15 steps announced on Monday by OECD, a global thinktank on economic policy, are the outcome of its project on tax Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (Beps) that will be reviewed by finance minister Arun Jaitley and his counterparts on October 8 at the G20 Finance minister’s meet in Peru.

Department of Economic Affairs secretary Shaktikanta Das said: “Our officers are part of the OECD working groups and India’s views are duly reflected in the report.” Revenue secretary Hasmukh Adhia also said India was very much in support of the Beps project.

Once these nations sign the multilateral legal instruments to prevent tax base erosion, all bilateral agreements they have signed including India’s double tax avoidance agreement with Mauritius will stand modified to that extent. That amounts to introducing a limitation of benefits clause in this treaty to deny its benefit to shell companies that do not have any business substance. Under the India-Mauritius treaty, tax on short term capital gain from India is taxable only in Mauritius, where it is zero rated. This has led to a lot of ‘post box companies’ being set up in the island nation only to route funds into Indian markets. Tax authorities call this ‘double-non-taxation.’ Currently, India is trying to re-negotiate the treaty bilaterally with Mauritius.

“As a destination competing for investments, Indian policymakers should be careful in implementing Beps and should ensure there are checks so that there is enough clarity and that the taxpayer is not burdened with litigation arising from Beps. Tax administrative reforms need to be concurrently pursued to avoid undue hardship to taxpayers,” said Vijay Iyer, National Leader, Transfer Pricing, EY India.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Software Development Software Programming Software Engineering Custom Software Development Requirement Based Software Development Software Solutions Software Serv

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions