Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: list of goods taxed at 4% :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: form 3cd :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: VAT RATES :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: cpt :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: empanelment :: TDS :: due date for vat payment :: VAT Audit :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: articles on VAT and GST in India
 
 
Transfer Pricing »
 The transfer pricing conflict is about profit shifting
 Transfer Pricing Compensating Adjustments: Another IRS Loss
 HMRC steps up inquiries into cross-border deals by big business
 An Overview of Transfer Pricing in China
 South Africa: transfer pricing record-keeping rules finalized
 India among the top three nations where transfer pricing policies faced official examination: EY Survey
 Vietnam publishes draft transfer pricing law to combat tax avoidance
 New transfer pricing documentation rules and fiscal assessment procedure in Finland
 India, US resolve tax disputes worth Rs 5,000 crore via APA
 India, UK sign three Advance Pricing Agreements
  Foreign Exchange Management (Insurance) Regulations, 2015

Finance ministry seeks to end high-profile tax disputes with foreign firms like Cairn India, Royal Dutch Shell
October, 06th 2015

The finance ministry, seeking to build on the recent success in pitching India as an attractive destination, is looking at burying for good the remaining high-profile acrimonious tax tangles involving Cairn India and Royal Dutch Shell, which have tarnished the country's administration. North Block is likely to replicate the Justice AP Shah panel mechanism, which helped address the issue of levying minimum alternate tax on foreign investors, to resolve the tax dispute with Cairn India and some remaining aspects of the Shell transfer pricing case. "We are looking at such a solution," a top finance ministry official told ET. The move is in line with finance minister Arun Jaitley's September 17 assurance that pending tax disputes would be put to rest by either judicial or executive resolution.

The government could send these cases to the Shah panel itself, as provided for in its original terms of reference. However, the Vodafone-Hutchison case will have to go through the due legal process. "Such a mechanism could not be applied where assessment orders have been issued," the official said. There is growing realisation in the government that high-decibel tax disputes have only hurt India's prospects as an investment destination and may not contribute to the tax kitty as well.

In the Cairn case, the income tax department had reasoned that Cairn UK Holdings made a capital gain when it transferred all its India assets in 2006 to a new company, Cairn India, which was subsequently listed on the stock exchanges. The department slapped a tax demand of Rs 20,495 crore on Cairn India for failing to deduct withholding tax on the alleged capital gains, prompting the company to serve a notice of arbitration on the government. The tax demand notice to Cairn India was identical to the one issued to Vodafone for not withholding tax on the payment of $11.2 billion made to Hong Kong-based Hutchison Whampoa for buying out its interests in Hutchison Essar in India in 2007.

Vodafone challenged the notice and subsequently won the case in 2012, with the Supreme Court rulsubseing that the cross-border deal was not taxable in India. The verdict led the government of the day to amend the law to tax indirect transfers with retrospective effect from 1961. The Narendra Modi led-NDA government has promised a fair, predictable and non-adversarial tax regime. Modi reiterated this promise when he met foreign investors in the US.

In the Shell case, the Bombay High Court had struck down a Rs 18,000 crore transfer pricing order imposed on the Anglo-Dutch multinational and the government decided not to appeal the decision. However, some issues remain with respect to the company, the official said.

The government could include this in the reference to the committee. The government had asked the Justice Shah panel to examine the levy of minimum alternate tax on foreign portfolio investors after tax authorities issued notices to them following a ruling by the Authority of Advance Rulings. It accepted the panel's recommendation that MAT could not be levied on FPIs and foreign companies that do have a permanent establishment and will amend the law to this effect. A circular has also been issued to put into effect the Shah panel's recommendations.

 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2016 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
System Testing Solution Manual Software Testing Solutions Automation Software Testing Solutions System Workflow Testing System Manual Testing

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions