sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
Latest Expert Exchange
From the Courts »
  Shantivijay Jewels Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
 Minda SM Technocast Pvt. Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
 Meta Plast Engineering P. Ltd. vs. ITO (ITAT Delhi)
 Shantivijay Jewels Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
  Amod Shivlal Shah vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
 The Shri Saibaba Sansthan Trust (Shirdi) vs. UOI (Bombay High Court)
  Pr CIT vs. JWC Logistics Park Pvt. Ltd (Bombay High Court)
 ITO (Exemptions) vs. Chandigarh Lawn Tennis Association (ITAT Chandigarh)
 Amod Shivlal Shah vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
 Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Private Ltd vs. IAC (Bombay High Court)
 Pr CIT vs. JWC Logistics Park Pvt. Ltd (Bombay High Court)

ACIT, Circle-6(3) R.No.522, 5th Floor Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road Mumbai-400 020. Vs. M/s.Morarjee Textiles Ltd. 2nd floor, Peninsula Spenta MAthuradas Mills Compound Senapati Bapat Marg, Lower Parel Mumbai-400 013.
October, 09th 2015
                              , `'   
                  ,      ,  
      Before S/Sh. Rajendra,Accountant Member & Saktijit Dey,Judicial Member
                    /.ITA No. 6200/Mum/2013, /Assessment Year-2009-10
       ACIT, Circle-6(3)                     M/s.Morarjee Textiles Ltd.
       R.No.522, 5 Floor                     2nd floor, Peninsula Spenta
       Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road          Vs MAthuradas Mills Compound
       Mumbai-400 020.                       Senapati Bapat Marg, Lower Parel
                                             Mumbai-400 013.
                                             PAN:AAACM 2725 R

               ( /Appellant)                            ( / Respondent)
                      /Assessee by                  : Shri Samir Tekriwal
                        / Revenue by                 : Shri Ronak Doshi

      / Date of Hearing                   : 08-10 -2015
      / Date of Pronouncement : 08 -10-2015
     , 1961   254(             254 ( 1 )     
    Order u/s.254(1)of the Inco me-tax Act,1961(Act)
Challenging the order dated 01.08.2013 of CIT(A)-12,Mumbai,the Assessing Officer(AO) has
filed the present appeal.

Assessee-company filed its return of income on 26.09.2009.A revised return was filed on 16.03.
2011,declaring total income of Rs.(-)31.91 Crores under the normal provisions and book loss of
Rs.30.03 Crores u/s.115JB of the Act.The AO completed the assessment u/s.143(3) of the Act on
30.12.2011,determining the income of the assessee at Rs.(-)30.17 Crores.He calculated the
income under the MAT provisions at Rs.(-)28.30 Crores.

2.Effective Ground of appeal deals with the value of current liabilities and provisions with regard
to calculation of the disallowance u/s.14A of the Act r.w.Rule 8D of the Income tax Rules,
1962(Rules).During the assessment proceedings,the AO found that the assessee had voluntarily
made a disallowance of Rs.1.87 Crores u/s.14A of the Act.However,the AO was of the opinion
that same was not in accordance with the provisions of Rule 8D of the Rules.After recording his
dissatisfac -tion about the correctness of the computation made by the assessee,the AO
recomputed the disallowance at Rs.3.61 Crores.

3.Aggrieved by the order of the AO,the assessee preferred an appeal before the First Appellate
Authority (FAA).Before him it was contented that the AO had erroneously included the foreign
investments while calculating the average value of investment for 14A purposes,that income
from such investments was taxable in the hands of the assessee,that he had mistakenly took
figure of Rs.1.41 Crores being 0.5% of average value of investment instead of the actual figure
of Rs 14. 19 lakhs,that the AO had added back the amount of current liabilities and provisions
while calculating the average value of total assets.After considering the submissions of the
                                                                      ITA/6200/13 morarjee T ,AY.0 9-10-

assessee and the assessment order,he held that the AO should verify the claim made by the
it about the taxable income arising from foreign investment and to work out the average
value of investment for the purpose of disallowance to be made u/s.14A of the Act.He
further directed the AO to verify the other claims made by the assessee,especially about the
amount of current liabilities and provisions.He further directed the AO to verify the claim
of the about adopting a wrong figure of Rs.1.41 crores for making disallowance.

4.Before us,the Departmental Representative(DR)supported the order of the AO.The Authorised
Representative relied upon the order of the FAA and stated that the AO had made an unjustified
addition u/s.14A of the Act.He relied upon the cases of Shitanshu Bipin Vora(ITA//2585/Mum/
2013-AY.2009-10,dated 26.09.2014) and KSM securities and Finance

5. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material before us.We find that the
FAA had directed the AO make certain verification.He has not deleted any addition.He has asked
the AO to adopt correct figures for making disallowance u/s.14A of the Act.If the assessee is
following net current asset method for preparing the balance sheet then the fact has to be
considered for deciding the issue of disallowance.In our opinion none of his directions suffer
from any legal infirmity.So,confirming his order,we decide effective ground of appeal against
the AO.

                   As a result,appeal filed by the AO stands dismissed.
         Order pronounced in the open court on    8th,October,2015.
                   8 ,2015    
            Sd/-                                         Sd/-
     (  / Shaktijit Dey)                           ( / RAJENDRA)
      / JUDICIAL MEMBER                             / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
/Mumbai,/Date: 8.10. 2015
   /Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1.Appellant /                           2. Respondent /
3.The concerned CIT(A)/   , 4.The concerned CIT /  
5.DR A Bench, ITAT, Mumbai / ,  ,...
6.Guard File/ 
                              //True Copy//
                                           / BY ORDER,
                                          /  Dy./Asst. Registrar
                                            ,  /ITAT, Mumbai.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2018 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Outsourcing Test Solutions Software Testing Software Bug Testing Software Issues Tracking Software Issue Fix Software Code Optimization Database Design Optimization

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions