Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court
 Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger
 Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court
 Delhi High Court Seeks Status Report from Centre for Appointments of Chairperson & Members in Adjudicating Authority Under PMLA
 Delhi High Court allows Income Tax Exemption to Charitable Society running Printing Press and uses Profit so generated for Charitable Purposes
 ITAT accepts Lease Income as Business Income as Business Investments were mostly in nature of Properties

M/s Hiranandani Akruti J V,Akruti Trade Centre,Road No.7,Marol, MIDC,Andheri (E),Mumbai-400093 Vs. Dy.. Commissioner of Income TaxCC 36, Room No.11, Gr.Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, M K Road, Mumbai-400020.
October, 09th 2015
                 ,   "" 
     IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL "H" BENCH, MUMBAI

        BEFORE S/SHRI B.R.BASKARAN, AM AND PAWAN SINGH, JM

                  ./I.T.A. No.375/Mum/2014
                 (   / Assessment Year:2006-07)
 M/s Hiranandani Akruti J V, / Dy.. Commissioner of Income Tax-
 Akruti Trade Centre,            CC 36, Room No.11,
                             Vs.
 Road No.7,                      Gr.Floor, Aayakar Bhavan,
 Marol, MIDC,                    M K Road,
 Andheri (E),                    Mumbai-400020.
 Mumbai-400093
        ( /Appellant)        ..  ( / Respondent)


                  ./I.T.A. No.1175/Mum/2014
                (   / Assessment Year:2006-07)
 Asstt. Commissioner of Income / M/s Hiranandani Akruti J V,
 Tax-CC 32, Room No.32(2),         M/s Hicons Developers,
                               Vs.
 Gr.Floor,                         Akruti Trade Centre, Road No.7,
 Aayalkar Bhavan,                  Marol, MIDC,
 M K Road, Marine Lines.           Andheri (E),
 Mumbai-400020.                    Mumbai-400093
        ( /Appellant)          ..  ( / Respondent)

        ./   ./PAN. :AAAAH1443H

            / Revenue by               S/Shri Ashok Jha &
                                       K Mohandas
            /Assessee by               Shri Pawan Ved


           / Date of Hearing                :8.10.2015
           /Date of Pronouncement:8.10.2015

                              / O R D E R
Per B R Baskaran, AM:

       The appeal filed by the assessee as well as Revenue relate to the
assessment year 2006-07.


2.     In appeal No.375/Mum/2014, the assessee is aggrieved by the
decision of ld.CIT(A) in initiating the penalty proceedings under section
                                      2
                                                        I T A N o . 1 1 7 5 / Mu m / 2 0 1 4
                                                                           3 7 5 / M/ 2 0 1 4

271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. In appeal No.1175/Mum/2014,
the Revenue is aggrieved by the decision of ld. CIT(A) in deleting the
penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act.






3.     We heard the parties and perused the record. It was pointed out by
the ld.DR that the appeal No.375/Mum/2014 filed by the assessee is
directed against the initiation of penalty proceeding by the ld.CIT(A). The
ld. DR submitted that the ld.CIT(A) has not ultimately passed any penalty
order. He further submitted the assessee cannot file any appeal for mere
initiation of penalty proceedings. The ld. AR did not dispute these factual
aspects. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal filed by the assessee being
ITA No.375/Mum/2014 in limine as not maintainable.


4.     With regard to the appeal filed by the Revenue, it was brought to
our notice that the addition on which the impugned penalty was levied has
since been deleted by the Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal, vide its order
dated 7.5.2014 passed in ITA No.374/Mum/2014 for the assessment year
2006-07. Consequent thereto, the penalty order does not have legs to
stand on its own and hence is liable to be quashed.           Accordingly, the
appeal filed by the Revenue is also liable to be dismissed.







5.     In the result, both the appeals are dismissed.

       Pronounced accordingly on 8th October, 2015.

                                     8th October, 2015    
        Sd                                                sd

      (PAWAN SINGH)                               ( B.R. BASKARAN)
     JUDICIAL MEMBER                                ACCOUNTANT MEMBER


 Mumbai:        8th October, 2015.
.../ SRL , Sr. PS
                          3
                                         I T A N o . 1 1 7 5 / Mu m / 2 0 1 4
                                                            3 7 5 / M/ 2 0 1 4




    /Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1.  / The Appellant
2.    / The Respondent.
3.    () / The CIT(A)- concerned
4.      / CIT concerned
5.    ,   ,                      /
     DR, ITAT, Mumbai concerned
6.     / Guard file.

         True copy                          / BY ORDER,

                                       (Asstt. Registrar)
                                ,  /ITAT, Mumbai

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting