Latest Expert Exchange Queries

GST Demo Service software link: https://ims.go2customer.com
Username: demouser Password: demopass
Get your inventory and invoicing software GST Ready from Binarysoft info@binarysoft.com
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
 
 
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing | GST - Goods and Services Tax
 
 
 
 
Popular Search: VAT RATES :: cpt :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD :: TDS :: due date for vat payment :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: VAT Audit :: empanelment :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: form 3cd :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4%
 
 
From the Courts »
 M/s Fiberfill Engineers Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
 Commissioner Of Income Tax, Del Vs. Mrs. Tara Sinha
 Unitech Wireless (Tamil Nadu) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, New Delhi & Ors.
 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax – 3 Vs. Delhi State Industrial Infrastructure Development Corp. Ltd.
 CIT vs. D. K. Garg (Delhi High Court)
 The Citizens Cooperative Society Ltd vs. ACIT (Supreme Court)
 Digipro Import & Export Pvt. Ltd vs. UOI (Delhi High Court)
  CIT vs. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd (Supreme Court)
  DCIT vs. Hita Land Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai)
 GTC Industries Limited vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) (Special Bench)
 Premlata Purshottam Paldiwal vs. CIT (Bombay High Court)

Smt. Sudesh Rani, Smt. Sudesh Rani, Proprietor, Proprietor, M/s Amba Marble Industries, M/s Amba Marble Industries, D----16, Industrial Estate, 6, Industrial Estate, 6, Industrial Estate, Vs.. Income Tax Officer, Income Tax Officer, Income Tax Officer, Ward----2,,,, Roorkee. Roorkee.
October, 16th 2013
                IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                                 `G' : NEW DELHI
                     DELHI BENCH `G

                        G.D.AGRAWAL, VICE PRESIDENT AND
            BEFORE SHRI G.D.AGRAWAL,
                       I.C.SUDHIR, JUDICIAL MEMBER
                  SHRI I.C.SUDHIR,

                              No.763/Del/2012
                          ITA No.763/Del/2012
                                         2007-08
                       Assessment Year : 2007-


Smt. Sudesh Rani,              Vs.    Income Tax Officer,
Proprietor,                           Ward-2,
                                      Ward-
M/s Amba Marble Industries,           Roorkee.
D-16, Industrial Estate,
Roorkee.
PAN : ADJPK2887M.

      (Appellant)                         (Respondent)

              Appellant by      :    None.
              Respondent by     :    Ms. Y.S.Kakkar, Sr.DR.

                                ORDER

    G.D.AGRAWAL, VP :
PER G.D.AGRAWAL,
       This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of
learned CIT(A)-II, Dehradun dated 2nd November, 2011 for the AY 2007-
08.


2.     At the time of hearing before us today i.e. 7th October, 2013,
neither anybody appeared on behalf of the assessee nor there was any
request for adjournment. The notice of hearing has duly been served
upon the assessee and the A.D. card is placed on record. Earlier also
on two occasions, i.e. on 17.09.2012 and 12.02.2013, the hearing was
adjourned at the request of the assessee.





3.     In view of the above, we are of the opinion that the assessee is
not interested in prosecuting this appeal. While taking this view, we
derive support from the decision of Delhi Bench of ITAT in the case of
                                   2                        ITA-763/Del/2012


CIT vs. Multiplan India (P.) Ltd. ­ [1991] 38 ITD 320 (Delhi).
Accordingly, we dismiss the assessee's appeal in limine.


4.    In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed in
limine.
Decision pronounced in the open Court on conclusion of hearing on 7th October, 2013. Sd/- Sd/- I.C.SUDHIR) (I.C.SUDHIR) (G.D.AGRAWAL) (G.D.AGRAWAL) JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT Dated : 07.10.2013 VK. Copy forwarded to: - 1. Appellant : Smt. Sudesh Rani, Proprietor, M/s Amba Marble Industries, D-16, Industrial Estate, Roorkee. 2. Respondent : Income Tax Officer, Ward- Ward-2, Roorkee. 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR, ITAT Assistant Registrar
 
 
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Contact Us

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions