Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
« From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court
 Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger
 Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court
 Delhi High Court Seeks Status Report from Centre for Appointments of Chairperson & Members in Adjudicating Authority Under PMLA
 Delhi High Court allows Income Tax Exemption to Charitable Society running Printing Press and uses Profit so generated for Charitable Purposes
 ITAT accepts Lease Income as Business Income as Business Investments were mostly in nature of Properties

M/s Glitz Financial Services ITO, (P) Ltd., Flat No.26, DDA Flats. Ward-12 (2), New Delhi. VS. Shivalik Road, Panchsheel Park, New Delhi.
October, 16th 2013
               IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                    (DELHI BENCH `C' NEW DELHI)

            BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, JUDICIAL MEMBER
                                AND
              SHRI T.S. KAPOOR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

                       I.T.A. No.5390/Del/2012
                      Assessment year : 2003-04

      M/s Glitz Financial Services                   ITO,
      (P) Ltd., Flat No.26, DDA Flats.               Ward-12 (2),
      Shivalik Road, Panchsheel Park,                New Delhi.
      New Delhi.                         V.

                 (Appellant)                   (Respondent)

                          /GIR/No.AABCG-
                                  AABCG-8658-
                      PAN /GIR/No.AABCG 8658-G

                  Appellant by : None
                  Respondent by : Shri Satpal Singh, Sr. DR.

                                    ORDER

PER TS KAPOOR, AM:

      This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of Ld
CIT(A) dated 6.7.2012. None was present on the date of hearing. The
appeal was originally fixed for hearing on 24.12.2012 which got
adjourned on two occasions due to non functioning of Bench but was
finally fixed for 29.5.2013 on which date also nobody appeared and
further notice was issued for 7.10.2013 on which date also nobody
appeared. It appears that the assessee is not interested in prosecuting
the appeal. Hence the appeal filed by the assessee is liable to be
dismissed for non prosecution. In our above view, we find support from
the following decisions:-
                                    2               ITA No5390/Del/2012







     1. In the case of CIT v. B.N. Bhattachargee & Another 118 ITR
     461 (relevant pages 477 & 478) wherein their Lordships have
     held that "The appeal does not mean merely filing of appeal but
     effectively of pursuing it."


     2. In the case of Estate of Late Tukoji Rao Holker v. CWT 223 IR
     480 (MP) while dismissing the reference made at the instance of
     assessee in default made following observations in their order:
     "if the party at whose instance the reference is made, fails to
     appear at the hearing, or fails in taking steps for preparation of
     the paper books so as to enable hearing of the reference, this
     court is not bound to answer the reference.
     3. In the case of CIT v. Multiplan India Pvt. Ltd. 38 ITD 320 (Del.)
     The appeal filed by the revenue before the Tribunal which was
     fixed for hearing but on the date of hearing nobody represented
     the revenue/applicant, nor any communication for adjournment
     was received. There was no communication or information as to
     why revenue choose to remain absent on that date. The Tribunal
     on the basis of inherent power treated the appeal filed by the
     revenue as un-admitted in view of Rule 19 of the Appellate
     Tribunal Rules, 1963.
Therefore, keeping in view the above, the appeal filed by the assessee
is dismissed for non prosecution.







2.   Order pronounced in the open court on 7th day of October, 2013.


     Sd/-                                              Sd/-
 (RAJPAL YADAV )                               (T.S. KAPOOR)
JUDICIAL MEMBER                            ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Dt. 07.10.2013.
HMS
                                 3             ITA No5390/Del/2012



Copy forwarded to:-
   1. The appellant
   2. The respondent
   3. The CIT
   4. The CIT (A)-, New Delhi.
   5. The DR, ITAT, Loknayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi.
True copy.
                                                   By Order


                                                  (ITAT, New Delhi).


Date of hearing                             7.10.2013

Date of Dictation                           7.10.2013

Date of Typing                              7.10.2013

Date of order signed by                     7.10.2013
both the Members &
pronouncement.

Date of order uploaded on net
& sent to the Bench concerned.

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2024 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting