Latest Expert Exchange Queries
sitemapHome | Registration | Job Portal for CA's | Expert Exchange | Currency Converter | Post Matrimonial Ads | Post Property Ads
News shortcuts: From the Courts | News Headlines | VAT (Value Added Tax) | Service Tax | Sales Tax | Placements & Empanelment | Various Acts & Rules | Latest Circulars | New Forms | Forex | Auditing | Direct Tax | Customs and Excise | ICAI | Corporate Law | Markets | Students | General | Indirect Tax | Mergers and Acquisitions | Continuing Prof. Edu. | Budget Extravaganza | Transfer Pricing
Popular Search: form 3cd :: VAT Audit :: empanelment :: due date for vat payment :: ICAI offer Get Windows 7,Office 2010 in Rs.799 Taxes :: TAX RATES - GOODS TAXABLE @ 4% :: VAT RATES :: list of goods taxed at 4% :: ACCOUNTING STANDARDS :: cpt :: Central Excise rule to resale the machines to a new company :: ARTICLES ON INPUT TAX CREDIT IN VAT :: articles on VAT and GST in India :: TDS :: ACCOUNTING STANDARD
From the Courts »
  Nishant Construction Pvt. Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
  DIT vs. A. P. Moller Maersk AS (Supreme Court)
  Larsen & Toubro Ltd vs. State of Jharkhand (Supreme Court)
  Nishant Construction Pvt. Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
 Samson Maritime Ltd vs. CIT (Bombay High Court)
 Mother Hospital Pvt. Ltd vs. CIT (Supreme Court)
 Larsen & Toubro Ltd vs. State of Jharkhand (Supreme Court)
 Nishant Construction Pvt. Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
 Flipkart India Private Limited vs. ACIT (Karnataka High Court)
 JSW Steel Ltd vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
  CIT vs. Uday M. Ghare (Bombay High Court)

M/s Glitz Financial Services ITO, (P) Ltd., Flat No.26, DDA Flats. Ward-12 (2), New Delhi. VS. Shivalik Road, Panchsheel Park, New Delhi.
October, 16th 2013
                    (DELHI BENCH `C' NEW DELHI)


                       I.T.A. No.5390/Del/2012
                      Assessment year : 2003-04

      M/s Glitz Financial Services                   ITO,
      (P) Ltd., Flat No.26, DDA Flats.               Ward-12 (2),
      Shivalik Road, Panchsheel Park,                New Delhi.
      New Delhi.                         V.

                 (Appellant)                   (Respondent)

                      PAN /GIR/No.AABCG 8658-G

                  Appellant by : None
                  Respondent by : Shri Satpal Singh, Sr. DR.



      This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of Ld
CIT(A) dated 6.7.2012. None was present on the date of hearing. The
appeal was originally fixed for hearing on 24.12.2012 which got
adjourned on two occasions due to non functioning of Bench but was
finally fixed for 29.5.2013 on which date also nobody appeared and
further notice was issued for 7.10.2013 on which date also nobody
appeared. It appears that the assessee is not interested in prosecuting
the appeal. Hence the appeal filed by the assessee is liable to be
dismissed for non prosecution. In our above view, we find support from
the following decisions:-
                                    2               ITA No5390/Del/2012

     1. In the case of CIT v. B.N. Bhattachargee & Another 118 ITR
     461 (relevant pages 477 & 478) wherein their Lordships have
     held that "The appeal does not mean merely filing of appeal but
     effectively of pursuing it."

     2. In the case of Estate of Late Tukoji Rao Holker v. CWT 223 IR
     480 (MP) while dismissing the reference made at the instance of
     assessee in default made following observations in their order:
     "if the party at whose instance the reference is made, fails to
     appear at the hearing, or fails in taking steps for preparation of
     the paper books so as to enable hearing of the reference, this
     court is not bound to answer the reference.
     3. In the case of CIT v. Multiplan India Pvt. Ltd. 38 ITD 320 (Del.)
     The appeal filed by the revenue before the Tribunal which was
     fixed for hearing but on the date of hearing nobody represented
     the revenue/applicant, nor any communication for adjournment
     was received. There was no communication or information as to
     why revenue choose to remain absent on that date. The Tribunal
     on the basis of inherent power treated the appeal filed by the
     revenue as un-admitted in view of Rule 19 of the Appellate
     Tribunal Rules, 1963.
Therefore, keeping in view the above, the appeal filed by the assessee
is dismissed for non prosecution.

2.   Order pronounced in the open court on 7th day of October, 2013.

     Sd/-                                              Sd/-
 (RAJPAL YADAV )                               (T.S. KAPOOR)
JUDICIAL MEMBER                            ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Dt. 07.10.2013.
                                 3             ITA No5390/Del/2012

Copy forwarded to:-
   1. The appellant
   2. The respondent
   3. The CIT
   4. The CIT (A)-, New Delhi.
   5. The DR, ITAT, Loknayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi.
True copy.
                                                   By Order

                                                  (ITAT, New Delhi).

Date of hearing                             7.10.2013

Date of Dictation                           7.10.2013

Date of Typing                              7.10.2013

Date of order signed by                     7.10.2013
both the Members &

Date of order uploaded on net
& sent to the Bench concerned.
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2017 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Binarysoft Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Binarysoft Technologies - Company Overview

Transfer Pricing | International Taxation | Business Consulting | Corporate Compliance and Consulting | Assurance and Risk Advisory | Indirect Taxes | Direct Taxes | Transaction Advisory | Regular Compliance and Reporting | Tax Assessments | International Taxation Advisory | Capital Structuring | Withholding tax advisory | Expatriate Tax Reporting | Litigation | Badges | Club Badges | Seals | Military Insignias | Emblems | Family Crest | Software Development India | Software Development Company | SEO Company | Web Application Development | MLM Software | MLM Solutions