Tally for CAs in Industry Silver Edition (Single User) Tally Renewal (Auditor Edition) Need Tally for Clients? (Tie-up with us!!!)
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Shri Ramit Vohra, Prop. M/s. Impact Enterprises, 9210/5, Multani Dhanda, Pahar Ganj, New Delhi Vs. ACIT, Circle : 63 (1) New Delhi.
 Smt. Bhavana Jain, Prop. M/s Akash Metal Industries, outside Barsi Gate, Hansi, Haryana Vs. ITO, Ward-1, Hisar, Haryana
 M/s Pearey Lal & Sons (E.P.) Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi. Vs. ACIT, Rohtak.
 Rajvanti Devi R/o Liwan Sonipat w/o Phool Kumar 96, R Model Town, Sonipat. Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-5, Sonipat.
 M/s. Anthena Multitrade Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly known as Good Life Impex Pvt. Ltd.) Vs. Income Tax Officer(E), Ward 6(2), (Old Jurisdiction)
 Ram Naresh Sikarwar, Ballabgarh. Vs. ITO, Ward-II(2), Faridabad.
 District Manager, HAFED, Site No.01, Opp.Main Market, Sector-5, Kurukshetra, Haryana Vs. JCIT, TDS Range, Karnal, Haryana
 Ravi Kumar Verma C/o. Pushkar Jain, Advocate, 115-C, Jain Nagar, Merut City-2 Uttar Pradesh Vs. ACIT Circle-2 Mewat
 Poonam Jain, A-2/15, F.F., Phase-3 Ashok Vihar, New Delhi Vs. Ito, Ward 34(4), Room No. 713, E-2 Block, Civic Centre, New Delhi
 AKT IMPEX PVT. LTD., D-28, SOUTH EXTENSION, PART-I, NEW DELHI Vs. ITO, WARD 2(4), NEW DELHI
 Nitin Gupta Shree Ji Jewellers, Shop No. 1168/3 and 4, Kucha Mahajani, Chandni Chowk Vs. ITO Ward-47(4) New Delhi
 MG Metalloy Pvt. Ltd, B-16, Sector-2, Noida Vs. DCIT, Central Circle, Noida
 Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 36(1), New Delhi. Vs. Shri Bharat Bhushan Sawhney, C-56, New Sabzi Mandi, Azadpur, Delhi.
 MR. SUBHASH CHANDER, C/O SURAJ BHAN NAIN, ADVOCATE, H.NO. 203, SECTOR-27, GURUGRAM, HARYANA Vs. ITO, WARD-4, HISAR
 Ranjan Kumar Ghai RRA Tax India D-28, South Extension, Part-I, New Delhi VS. DCIT Central Circle-I Gurgaon

Ram Naresh Sikarwar, Ballabgarh. Vs. ITO, Ward-II(2), Faridabad.
September, 04th 2021

ITA No.-2298/Del/2018.
Ram Naresh Sikarwar

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
(DELHI BENCH: ‘F’: NEW DELHI)

(THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING)

BEFORE MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER
AND

SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

ITA No:- 2298/Del/2018

(Assessment Year: 2009-10)

Ram Naresh Sikarwar, ITO,
Ballabgarh. Vs. Ward-II(2),

APPELLANT Faridabad.
RESPONDENT

PAN No: AUSPS0203K

Assessee By : None
Revenue By : Shri Jagdish Singh, Sr. DR

Per Anadee Nath Misshra, AM

(A) This appeal by Assessee is filed against the order of Learned Commissioner of

Income Tax (Appeals), Faridabad, [“Ld. CIT(A)”, for short], dated 01.11.2017 for

Assessment Year 2009-10. Grounds taken in this appeal of Assessee are as under:

“1. On the facts and circumstances of the case and legal provisions the
learned Commissioner of Income Tax Appeals Faridabad erred in
confirming the addition of Rs. 441300 made by the learned Assessing
Officer in the assessment Order.
2.The appellant craves leave to add, amend, delete, and modify any
grounds of the appeal before / during the hearing of the appeal and all the
above grounds are without prejudice to each other.”

(B) At the time of hearing, we took notice of letter dated 08.03.2021 filed by the

appellant. In this letter it has been intimated that the assessee has opted for the Vivad Se
Page 1 of 3
ITA No.-2298/Del/2018.
Ram Naresh Sikarwar

Vishwas Scheme, 2020 (“VSVS”, for short). A copy of Form-3 dated 25/01/2021 issued by
Designated Authority under VSVS is also enclosed with this letter. In view of this, the
learned Senior Departmental Representative (“Ld. Sr. DR”, for short) submitted before us
that this appeal may be treated as withdrawn and may be dismissed on account of the
aforesaid VSVS. After due consideration, and in view of the foregoing; we treat this appeal
as withdrawn on account of the aforesaid VSVS. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.

(B.1) Before we part, we hereby clarify, by way of abundant caution, that if for
some reason it is found by Assessee that the disputes under this appeal before
us are not fully settled under the aforesaid VSVS, then Assessee will be at
liberty to approach ITAT for restoration of this appeal, in accordance with law.

(C) In the result, this appeal is dismissed.

This order was orally pronounced on 2nd September, 2021 in Open Court, in the
absence of any representative from assessee’s side, but in the presence of Ld.
Sr. DR; after conclusion of the hearing. Now this written order is signed today
on 03/09/21.

Sd/- Sd/-
(SUCHITRA KAMBLE) (ANADEE NATH MISSHRA)
JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Dated: 03/09/21 Page 2 of 3
(Pooja)
Copy forwarded to: ITA No.-2298/Del/2018.
1. Appellant Ram Naresh Sikarwar
2. Respondent
3. CIT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
4. CIT(Appeals) ITAT NEW DELHI
5. DR: ITAT

Date of dictation

Date on which the typed draft is placed before the
dictating Member
Date on which the typed draft is placed before the
Other Member

Date on which the approved draft comes to the Sr.
PS/PS

Date on which the fair order is placed before the
Dictating Member for pronouncement

Date on which the fair order comes back to the Sr.
PS/PS
Date on which the final order is uploaded on the
website of ITAT

Date on which the file goes to the Bench Clerk

Date on which the file goes to the Head Clerk

The date on which the file goes to the Assistant
Registrar for signature on the order

Date of dispatch of the Order

Page 3 of 3

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2021 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting