Ram Naresh Sikarwar, Ballabgarh. Vs. ITO, Ward-II(2), Faridabad.
September, 04th 2021
ITA No.-2298/Del/2018. Ram Naresh Sikarwar
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH: ‘F’: NEW DELHI)
(THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING)
BEFORE MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND
SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
ITA No:- 2298/Del/2018
(Assessment Year: 2009-10)
Ram Naresh Sikarwar, ITO, Ballabgarh. Vs. Ward-II(2),
APPELLANT Faridabad. RESPONDENT
PAN No: AUSPS0203K
Assessee By : None Revenue By : Shri Jagdish Singh, Sr. DR
Per Anadee Nath Misshra, AM
(A) This appeal by Assessee is filed against the order of Learned Commissioner of
Income Tax (Appeals), Faridabad, [“Ld. CIT(A)”, for short], dated 01.11.2017 for
Assessment Year 2009-10. Grounds taken in this appeal of Assessee are as under:
“1. On the facts and circumstances of the case and legal provisions the learned Commissioner of Income Tax Appeals Faridabad erred in confirming the addition of Rs. 441300 made by the learned Assessing Officer in the assessment Order. 2.The appellant craves leave to add, amend, delete, and modify any grounds of the appeal before / during the hearing of the appeal and all the above grounds are without prejudice to each other.”
(B) At the time of hearing, we took notice of letter dated 08.03.2021 filed by the
appellant. In this letter it has been intimated that the assessee has opted for the Vivad Se Page 1 of 3 ITA No.-2298/Del/2018. Ram Naresh Sikarwar
Vishwas Scheme, 2020 (“VSVS”, for short). A copy of Form-3 dated 25/01/2021 issued by Designated Authority under VSVS is also enclosed with this letter. In view of this, the learned Senior Departmental Representative (“Ld. Sr. DR”, for short) submitted before us that this appeal may be treated as withdrawn and may be dismissed on account of the aforesaid VSVS. After due consideration, and in view of the foregoing; we treat this appeal as withdrawn on account of the aforesaid VSVS. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.
(B.1) Before we part, we hereby clarify, by way of abundant caution, that if for some reason it is found by Assessee that the disputes under this appeal before us are not fully settled under the aforesaid VSVS, then Assessee will be at liberty to approach ITAT for restoration of this appeal, in accordance with law.
(C) In the result, this appeal is dismissed.
This order was orally pronounced on 2nd September, 2021 in Open Court, in the absence of any representative from assessee’s side, but in the presence of Ld. Sr. DR; after conclusion of the hearing. Now this written order is signed today on 03/09/21.
Sd/- Sd/- (SUCHITRA KAMBLE) (ANADEE NATH MISSHRA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Dated: 03/09/21 Page 2 of 3 (Pooja) Copy forwarded to: ITA No.-2298/Del/2018. 1. Appellant Ram Naresh Sikarwar 2. Respondent 3. CIT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 4. CIT(Appeals) ITAT NEW DELHI 5. DR: ITAT
Date of dictation
Date on which the typed draft is placed before the dictating Member Date on which the typed draft is placed before the Other Member
Date on which the approved draft comes to the Sr. PS/PS
Date on which the fair order is placed before the Dictating Member for pronouncement
Date on which the fair order comes back to the Sr. PS/PS Date on which the final order is uploaded on the website of ITAT
Date on which the file goes to the Bench Clerk
Date on which the file goes to the Head Clerk
The date on which the file goes to the Assistant Registrar for signature on the order