Tally for CAs in Industry Silver Edition (Single User) Tally Renewal (Auditor Edition) Need Tally for Clients? (Tie-up with us!!!)
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Shri Ramit Vohra, Prop. M/s. Impact Enterprises, 9210/5, Multani Dhanda, Pahar Ganj, New Delhi Vs. ACIT, Circle : 63 (1) New Delhi.
 Smt. Bhavana Jain, Prop. M/s Akash Metal Industries, outside Barsi Gate, Hansi, Haryana Vs. ITO, Ward-1, Hisar, Haryana
 M/s Pearey Lal & Sons (E.P.) Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi. Vs. ACIT, Rohtak.
 Rajvanti Devi R/o Liwan Sonipat w/o Phool Kumar 96, R Model Town, Sonipat. Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-5, Sonipat.
 M/s. Anthena Multitrade Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly known as Good Life Impex Pvt. Ltd.) Vs. Income Tax Officer(E), Ward 6(2), (Old Jurisdiction)
 Ram Naresh Sikarwar, Ballabgarh. Vs. ITO, Ward-II(2), Faridabad.
 District Manager, HAFED, Site No.01, Opp.Main Market, Sector-5, Kurukshetra, Haryana Vs. JCIT, TDS Range, Karnal, Haryana
 Ravi Kumar Verma C/o. Pushkar Jain, Advocate, 115-C, Jain Nagar, Merut City-2 Uttar Pradesh Vs. ACIT Circle-2 Mewat
 Poonam Jain, A-2/15, F.F., Phase-3 Ashok Vihar, New Delhi Vs. Ito, Ward 34(4), Room No. 713, E-2 Block, Civic Centre, New Delhi
 AKT IMPEX PVT. LTD., D-28, SOUTH EXTENSION, PART-I, NEW DELHI Vs. ITO, WARD 2(4), NEW DELHI
 Nitin Gupta Shree Ji Jewellers, Shop No. 1168/3 and 4, Kucha Mahajani, Chandni Chowk Vs. ITO Ward-47(4) New Delhi
 MG Metalloy Pvt. Ltd, B-16, Sector-2, Noida Vs. DCIT, Central Circle, Noida
 Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 36(1), New Delhi. Vs. Shri Bharat Bhushan Sawhney, C-56, New Sabzi Mandi, Azadpur, Delhi.
 MR. SUBHASH CHANDER, C/O SURAJ BHAN NAIN, ADVOCATE, H.NO. 203, SECTOR-27, GURUGRAM, HARYANA Vs. ITO, WARD-4, HISAR
 Ranjan Kumar Ghai RRA Tax India D-28, South Extension, Part-I, New Delhi VS. DCIT Central Circle-I Gurgaon

Poonam Jain, A-2/15, F.F., Phase-3 Ashok Vihar, New Delhi Vs. Ito, Ward 34(4), Room No. 713, E-2 Block, Civic Centre, New Delhi
September, 02nd 2021

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
DELHI BENCH ‘SMC’ : NEW DELHI
(Through Video Conferencing)

BEFORE SHRI R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

ITA No. 7058/Del/2019
Assessment Year : 2011-12

POONAM JAIN, Vs. ITO, WARD 34(4),
A-2/15, F.F., PHASE-3 ROOM NO. 713, E-2 BLOCK,
ASHOK VIHAR, CIVIC CENTRE,
NEW DELHI – 52 NEW DELHI – 2
(PAN: ACXPJ2719C)
(Respondent)
(Appellant)

Appellant by : None
Respondent by : Shri R.K. Gupta, SR. DR.

Date of hearing : 31.08.2021

Date of pronouncement : 31.08.2021

ORDER

This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2011-12 is directed against
the Order of Learned CIT(A)-12, New Delhi.


2. None appeared on behalf of the assessee at the time of virtual hearing.
However, the assessee vide letter dated 31.08.2021 has requested for withdrawal of
the appeal filed by the assessee and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the
dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under
the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. A certificate to this effect under Section 5(1) of
The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 has also been filed and also filed the
copy of challan no. 41244 evidencing the payment of tax of Rs. 86,246/-.
3. Learned Senior DR has no objection.


4. In view of the above, I accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of the
aforesaid appeal.
2

5. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Above decision was pronounced on conclusion of Virtual Hearing on

31st August, 2021.
Sd/-

(R.K. PANDA)
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Date: 31.08.2021

SRB

Copy forwarded to: -
1. Appellant.
2. Respondent.
3. CIT
4. CIT(A)
5. DR, ITAT

Assistant Registrar

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2021 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting