|
|
|
| « From the Courts » |
|---|
| Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs |  Shri Ramit Vohra, Prop. M/s. Impact Enterprises, 9210/5, Multani Dhanda, Pahar Ganj, New Delhi Vs. ACIT, Circle : 63 (1) New Delhi. | | Smt. Bhavana Jain, Prop. M/s Akash Metal Industries, outside Barsi Gate, Hansi, Haryana Vs. ITO, Ward-1, Hisar, Haryana | | M/s Pearey Lal & Sons (E.P.) Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi. Vs. ACIT, Rohtak. | | Rajvanti Devi R/o Liwan Sonipat w/o Phool Kumar 96, R Model Town, Sonipat. Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-5, Sonipat. | | M/s. Anthena Multitrade Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly known as Good Life Impex Pvt. Ltd.) Vs. Income Tax Officer(E), Ward 6(2), (Old Jurisdiction) | | Ram Naresh Sikarwar, Ballabgarh. Vs. ITO, Ward-II(2), Faridabad. | | District Manager, HAFED, Site No.01, Opp.Main Market, Sector-5, Kurukshetra, Haryana Vs. JCIT, TDS Range, Karnal, Haryana | | Ravi Kumar Verma C/o. Pushkar Jain, Advocate, 115-C, Jain Nagar, Merut City-2 Uttar Pradesh Vs. ACIT Circle-2 Mewat | | Poonam Jain, A-2/15, F.F., Phase-3 Ashok Vihar, New Delhi Vs. Ito, Ward 34(4), Room No. 713, E-2 Block, Civic Centre, New Delhi | | AKT IMPEX PVT. LTD., D-28, SOUTH EXTENSION, PART-I, NEW DELHI Vs. ITO, WARD 2(4), NEW DELHI | | Nitin Gupta Shree Ji Jewellers, Shop No. 1168/3 and 4, Kucha Mahajani, Chandni Chowk Vs. ITO Ward-47(4) New Delhi | | MG Metalloy Pvt. Ltd, B-16, Sector-2, Noida Vs. DCIT, Central Circle, Noida | | Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 36(1), New Delhi. Vs. Shri Bharat Bhushan Sawhney, C-56, New Sabzi Mandi, Azadpur, Delhi. | | MR. SUBHASH CHANDER, C/O SURAJ BHAN NAIN, ADVOCATE, H.NO. 203, SECTOR-27, GURUGRAM, HARYANA Vs. ITO, WARD-4, HISAR | | Ranjan Kumar Ghai RRA Tax India D-28, South Extension, Part-I, New Delhi VS. DCIT Central Circle-I Gurgaon |
|
|
|
|
|
| « Ravi Kumar Verma C/o. Pushkar Jain, Advocate, 115-C, Jain... | AKT IMPEX PVT. LTD., D-28, SOUTH EXTENSION, PART-I, NEW... » |
Poonam Jain, A-2/15, F.F., Phase-3 Ashok Vihar, New Delhi Vs. Ito, Ward 34(4), Room No. 713, E-2 Block, Civic Centre, New Delhi |
|
|
| September, 02nd 2021 |
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
DELHI BENCH ‘SMC’ : NEW DELHI
(Through Video Conferencing)
BEFORE SHRI R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
ITA No. 7058/Del/2019
Assessment Year : 2011-12
POONAM JAIN, Vs. ITO, WARD 34(4),
A-2/15, F.F., PHASE-3 ROOM NO. 713, E-2 BLOCK,
ASHOK VIHAR, CIVIC CENTRE,
NEW DELHI – 52 NEW DELHI – 2
(PAN: ACXPJ2719C)
(Respondent)
(Appellant)
Appellant by : None
Respondent by : Shri R.K. Gupta, SR. DR.
Date of hearing : 31.08.2021
Date of pronouncement : 31.08.2021
ORDER
This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2011-12 is directed against
the Order of Learned CIT(A)-12, New Delhi.
2. None appeared on behalf of the assessee at the time of virtual hearing.
However, the assessee vide letter dated 31.08.2021 has requested for withdrawal of
the appeal filed by the assessee and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the
dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under
the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. A certificate to this effect under Section 5(1) of
The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 has also been filed and also filed the
copy of challan no. 41244 evidencing the payment of tax of Rs. 86,246/-.
3. Learned Senior DR has no objection.
4. In view of the above, I accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of the
aforesaid appeal.
2
5. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Above decision was pronounced on conclusion of Virtual Hearing on
31st August, 2021.
Sd/-
(R.K. PANDA)
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Date: 31.08.2021
SRB
Copy forwarded to: -
1. Appellant.
2. Respondent.
3. CIT
4. CIT(A)
5. DR, ITAT
Assistant Registrar
|
|
|
