IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
DELHI BENCHES : "H" NEW DELHI
BEFORE SHRI H.S.SIDHU, JM AND
AND
SHRI J.SUDHAKAR REDDY, AM
ITA No: 2949/Del/2012
AY : - 2008-09
Sh.Umed Singh vs. ITO, Ward 1(5)
S/o Shri Ranjit Singh Faridabad
H.No. 2817 A, Housing Colony
Sector 3, Faridabad
PAN: AZNPS 5244 G
(Appellant) (Respondent)
Appellant by : None
Respondent by: Sh. Sameer Sharma, Sr.D.R.
ORDER
PER J.SUDHAKAR REDDY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order dt.
16.03.2012 of Ld.CIT(A), Faridabad for Assessment Year 2008-09.
2. On the date of hearing i.e. on 24.09.2014, none appeared on
behalf of the assessee nor any adjournment application was received.
The notice sent was returned by the postal authorities with the remark
"Left". We find from the record that on earlier occasions also the
appeal had been adjourned. Hence we presume that the assessee is not
interested in prosecuting the appeal.
2
3. Following the decisions in the case of CIT vs. Multiplan India
P.Ltd. 38 ITD, 320 (Delhi), and the decision of the Hon'ble Bombay High
Court in the case of M/s Chemipol vs. UOI and others in Central Excise
Appeal No. 62/2009 judgement dt. 17th September,2009, we consider it
a fit case for dismissing the appeals in limine, as not admitted. We may
like to clarify that subsequently, if the assessee explains the reasons for
non-appearance and if the Bench is so satisfied, the matter may be
recalled for the purpose of adjudication of the appeal.
4. In the result, the appeal by the assessee stands dismissed for
non-prosecution.
Order pronounced in the Open Court on 24th September,2014.
Sd/- Sd/-
(H.S.SIDHU) (J.SUDHAKAR REDDY)
JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Dated: the 24th September, ,2014
*manga
3
Copy of the Order forwarded to:
1. Appellant;
2.Respondent;
3.CIT;
4.CIT(A);
5.DR;
6.Guard File
By Order
Asst. Registrar
|
