We are sharing with you an important judgment of Hon’ble CESTAT Mumbai in the case of Murli Realtors Pvt. Ltd. and others Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise Pune-II [2014 (9) TMI 461 - CESTAT MUMBAI] on the following issue:

Issue:

Whether the notional interest on the interest free deposit can be added to the value of taxable services?

Facts and background:

Murli Realtors Pvt. Ltd. and others (“the Appellants”) are lessors of immovable property who have leased out their premises on long time lease ranging from 5 to 10 years and in consideration receiving lease rentals on a monthly basis. In addition to these rentals, they are also taking interest free security deposits from the lessees which vary from six months' rent to one year's rent (“security deposits”) to secure default in payment of rentals, default in payment of utility charges, if any, and damage caused to the property other than the usual wear and tear. These deposits are returned to the lessee at the end of the lease period.

The Department contended that the taking of security deposit has suppressed the lease rentals and, therefore, notional interest at the rate of 18% of the deposit should be added to the rent received and Service tax should be payable on the notional interest on the security deposit.

The Hon’ble CESTAT, Mumbai relied upon the following judgements:

· Moriroku UT India (P) Ltd. Vs. State of UP [2008 (3) TMI 513 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA];

· Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. J.K. Investors (Bombay) Ltd. [2000 (6) TMI 9 - BOMBAY High Court ];

· Central Excise, Mumbai -III Vs. ISPL Industries Ltd. [2003 (4) TMI 99 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA];

· Intercontinental Consultants and Technocrafts Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India andAnr. [2012 (12) TMI 150 - DELHI HIGH COURT]

Held:

The Hon’ble CESTAT, Mumbai held that there is no provision in Service tax law for deeming notional interest on security deposit taken as a consideration for leasing of the immovable property. Therefore, in the absence of a specific provision in law there is no scope for adding any notional interest to the value of taxable service rendered. It was further held by the Hon’ble Tribunal that in the absence of any evidence being adduced by the Revenue to show that the security deposit taken has influenced the price i.e. the rent in any way, it is not possible to conclude that the notional interest on the security deposit would form part of the rent.

Hope the information will assist you in your Professional endeavors. In case of any query/ information, please do not hesitate to write back to us.

Thanks and Best Regards

Bimal Jain
FCA, FCS, LLB, B.Com (Hons.)

Flat No. 34B, Ground Floor,

Pocket-1, MayurVihar, Phase–I,

Delhi – 110091

Desktel: +91-11-22757595/42427056

Mobile: +91 9810604563

Email: bimaljain@hotmail.com

Website: www.a2ztaxcorp.com

Disclaimer: The contents of this document are solely for informational purpose. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the authors nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this document nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Readers are advised to consult the professional for understanding applicability of this newsletter in the respective scenarios. While due care has been taken in preparing this document, the existence of mistakes and omissions herein is not ruled out. No part of this document should be distributed or copied (except for personal, non-commercial use) without our written permission.