Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
From the Courts »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Inordinate delay in income tax appeal hearings
 Income Tax leviable on Tuition Fee in the Year of Rendering of Services: ITAT
 Supreme Court invoked its power under Article 142 of Constitution to validate notices issued under section 148 as notices issued under section 148A. However the same shall be subject to amended provisions of section 149.
 ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand
 Bombay HC sets aside rejection of refund claims by GST authorities
 [Income Tax Act] Faceless Assessment Scheme does not take away right to personal hearing: Delhi High Court
 Rajasthan High Court directs GST Authority to Unblock Input Tax Credit availed in Electronic Credit Ledger
 Sebi-taxman fight over service tax dues reaches Supreme Court
 Delhi High Court Seeks Status Report from Centre for Appointments of Chairperson & Members in Adjudicating Authority Under PMLA
 Delhi High Court allows Income Tax Exemption to Charitable Society running Printing Press and uses Profit so generated for Charitable Purposes
 ITAT accepts Lease Income as Business Income as Business Investments were mostly in nature of Properties

M/s. Kotak Securities Ltd. 1st Bakthawar, 229 Nariman Point, Mumbai 400021 Vs. Addl. CIT, Range 4(3) Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road Mumbai 400020
September, 05th 2014
                         "A" Bench, Mumbai

                Before Shri D. Manmohan, Vice President
                 and Shri Rajendra, Accountant Member

                ITA No. 2091, 2092 & 8310/Mum/2011
             (Assessment Years: 2006-07, 2007-08 & 2008-09)

     M/s. Kotak Securities Ltd.         Addl. CIT, Range 4(3)
     1st Bakthawar, 229 Nariman     Vs. Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road
     Point, Mumbai 400021               Mumbai 400020
                            PAN - AAACK3436F
               Appellant                        Respondent

                ITA No. 2622, 2624 & 8031/Mum/2011
             (Assessment Years: 2006-07, 2007-08 & 2008-09)

     DCIT, Range 4(3)                M/s. Kotak Securities Ltd.
     Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road   Vs. 1st Bakthawar, 229 Nariman
     Mumbai 400020                   Point, Mumbai 400021
                          PAN - AAACK3436F
              Appellant                      Respondent

                   Appellant by:    Shri F.V. Irani
                   Respondent by:   Capt. Pradeep Arya

                   Date of Hearing:       03.09.2014
                   Date of Pronouncement: 03.09.2014


Per Bench

     These cross appeals by the assessee and the Revenue pertain to
assessment years 2006-07 to 2008-09.

2.    At the time of hearing both the parties admitted that the issues
emerging out of these appeals are identical in all these appeals and,
therefore, we proceed to dispose of these appeals by a combined order for
the sake of convenience.

3.    During the course of hearing the learned counsel for the assessee filed
a chart mentioning the brief issues, grounds urged by the Assessee/Revenue
in these appeals and the quantum involved therein which is made as
Annexure 1 to this order. The learned counsel for the assessee relied upon
                                       2                ITA No. 2091+5/Mum/2011
                                                          M/s. Kotak Securities Ltd.

the following decisions of the Tribunal to submit that identical issues were
considered by the ITAT, Mumbai Benches wherein the matters were broadly
decided in favour of the assessee or set aside for taking appropriate decision
at the end of the AO on the lines indicated therein and, therefore, requested
that in the appeals before us also the Tax Authorities may be directed to
follow the ratio laid down in the that cases: -

i)     ITA No. 63/Mum/2010 dated 25.11.2011
ii)    ITA No. 5251/Mum/2010 dated 11.04.2012
iii)   ITA No. 4139, 4140 & 4141/Mum/2011 dated 13.02.2013
iv)    ITA No. 1817 & 1818/Mum/2011 dated 27.03.2014
v)     ITA No. 7271 to 7274/Mum/2010, ITA No.7334&7335/Mum/2010 &
       ITA No. 8313/Mum/2011 dated 16.01.2013
vi)    ITA No. 8297/Mum/2011 dated 23.11.2012
vii)   ITA No. 8404, 1819 & 1730/Mum/2011 dated 29.11.2012

4.     At the time of hearing both the parties admitted that it would be
sufficient if a direction is given to the AO to follow the ratio laid down in the
above mentioned cases.

5.     Having regard to the circumstances of the case we hereby set aside
the orders passed by the CIT(A) on the impugned issues and direct the AO to
follow the ratio laid down by the ITAT, Mumbai Benches in the cases cited

6.     In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee company as well as
the Revenue are disposed of accordingly.

Order pronounced in the open court on 3rd September, 2014.

                Sd/-                                      Sd/-
             (Rajendra)                             (D. Manmohan)
         Accountant Member                           Vice President

Mumbai, Dated: 3rd September, 2014
                                       3               ITA No. 2091+5/Mum/2011
                                                         M/s. Kotak Securities Ltd.

Copy to:

   1.   The   Appellant
   2.   The   Respondent
   3.   The   CIT(A) ­ 10, Mumbai
   4.   The   CIT­ 4, Mumbai City
   5.   The   DR, "A" Bench, ITAT, Mumbai

                                                      By Order

//True Copy//
                                                   Assistant Registrar
                                           ITAT, Mumbai Benches, Mumbai
Annexure - 1
Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2023 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting