Need Tally
for Clients?

Contact Us! Here

  Tally Auditor

License (Renewal)
  Tally Gold

License Renewal

  Tally Silver

License Renewal
  Tally Silver

New Licence
  Tally Gold

New Licence
 
Open DEMAT Account with in 24 Hrs and start investing now!
Latest Circulars »
Open DEMAT Account in 24 hrs
 Directions under Section 35 A read with section 56 of the Banking Regulation Act 1949 (As Applicable to Co-operative Societies) Pune Sahakari Bank Ltd., Shivajinagar, Pune
 Designation of 1 individual and 2 organisations under Section 35(1) (a) and 2(1) (m) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act,1967 and their listing in the Fourth and First Schedule of the Act- Reg.
 Applications of Online Payment Aggregators received under the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007 - Status
 RBI imposes monetary penalty on The Vaidyanath Urban Co-operative Bank Limited, Parli Vaijnath, Beed (Maharashtra)
  Finance Minister addresses the Central Board of Directors of Reserve Bank of India
  Finance Minister addresses the Central Board of Directors of Reserve Bank of India
 Issuance of PPIs to Foreign Nationals / Non-Resident Indians (NRIs) visiting India
 RBI statement on the health of Indian Banking sector
 Implementation of Section 51A of UAPA,1967: Updates to UNSCs 1267/ 1989 ISIL (Daesh) & Al-Qaida Sanctions List (Amendments to 29 entries)
 Designation of 3 individuals as Terrorists under Section 35 (1) (a) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), 1967 and their listing in the Schedule IV of the Act-Reg.
 Auction of Government of India Dated Securities Jan 23, 2023

Guidelines on Wilful Defaulters Clarification regarding Guarantor, Lender and Unit
September, 10th 2014

RBI/2014-15/221
DBOD.No.CID. 41/20.16.003/2014-15

September 9, 2014

All Scheduled Commercial Banks (excluding RRBs and LABs) and
All India Notified Financial Institutions (FIs)

Dear Sir/ Madam

Guidelines on Wilful Defaulters –
Clarification regarding Guarantor, Lender and Unit

Please refer to the Master Circular on Wilful Defaulters DBOD.No.CID.BC.3/20.16.003/2014-15 dated July 1, 2014.

2. Paragraph 2.1 of the circular lists out various events when a “wilful default” would be deemed to have occurred. In view of references received from a few banks regarding scope/definition of “wilful default”, it is clarified as follows:

  1. The term ‘lender’ appearing in the circular covers all banks/FIs to which any amount is due, provided it is arising on account of any banking transaction, including off balance sheet transactions such as derivatives, guarantee and Letter of Credit.

  2. The term ‘unit’ appearing therein has to be taken to include individuals, juristic persons and all other forms of business enterprises, whether incorporated or not. In case of business enterprises (other than companies), banks/FIs may also report (in the Director column) the names of those persons who are in charge and responsible for the management of the affairs of the business enterprise.

3. Paragraph 2.6 of the circular is amended to read as follows:

“While dealing with wilful default of a single borrowing company in a Group, the banks /FIs should consider the track record of the individual company, with reference to its repayment performance to its lenders. However, in cases where guarantees furnished by the companies within the Group on behalf of the wilfully defaulting units are not honoured when invoked by the banks /FIs, such Group companies should also be reckoned as wilful defaulters”.

4. In connection with the guarantors, banks have raised queries regarding inclusion of names of guarantors who are either individuals (not being directors of the company) or non-group corporates in the list of wilful defaulters. It is advised that in terms of Section 128 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the liability of the surety is co-extensive with that of the principal debtor unless it is otherwise provided by the contract. Therefore, when a default is made in making repayment by the principal debtor, the banker will be able to proceed against the guarantor/surety even without exhausting the remedies against the principal debtor. As such, where a banker has made a claim on the guarantor on account of the default made by the principal debtor, the liability of the guarantor is immediate. In case the said guarantor refuses to comply with the demand made by the creditor/banker, despite having sufficient means to make payment of the dues, such guarantor would also be treated as a wilful defaulter. It is clarified that this would apply only prospectively and not to cases where guarantees were taken prior to this circular. Banks/FIs may ensure that this position is made known to all prospective guarantors at the time of accepting guarantees.

5. Banks/FIs may take due care to follow the provisions set out in paragraph 3 of the Master Circular on Wilful Defaulters dated July 1, 2014 in identifying and reporting instances of wilful default in respect of guarantors also. While reporting such names to RBI, banks/FIs may include “Guar” in brackets i.e. (Guar) against the name of the guarantor and report the same in the Director column.

6. This circular is issued in exercise of the powers conferred upon Reserve Bank of India under Section 35A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949.

Yours faithfully

(A K Pandey)
Chief General Manager

Home | About Us | Terms and Conditions | Contact Us
Copyright 2023 CAinINDIA All Right Reserved.
Designed and Developed by Ritz Consulting